Search results

As he was at the time he "won" the prize as well.

I feel quite certain that SaS is a PR arm of SMC.

Oh and an afterthought--I don't see Tuller's questions as particularly challenging. I think we ought to be referring to them as straightforward, which is what they are/were. He was as part of the public invited to "Dare to Disrupt" the narrative of ME, and he did exactly that, in a...

The irony here is worthy of some tweetage for those who do that.... It's actually almost beautiful in its simplicity and pointedness.

We need courageous insiders to speak up en masse so we can watch the dominos fall, Weinstein-style. (somehow typing this gave me the unwelcome mental image of Harvey doing the Gangnam dance :nailbiting::bag: )

Welcome to the forum, @Mike Harley and @Grigor , it's great to see you here. Thank you so much both of you for bringing awareness. So amazing and heartwarming!

Positively reeks!

Wrong diagnosis. Period.

A huge round of applause to that French doctor and all participants. What an amazing idea, and kudos to those medical professionals open enough to participate in this experiment of empathy and understanding.

See, you ME patients are so confused and angry for no reason, here we are doing what you asked--giving you a voice--and you're complaining? You lot are never satisfied! Here we are hijacking your legit narrative to make it look like we're helping you right where it counts and all you can do is...

Wow, so well-written. It's so great the author was able to articulate so clearly what I simply cannot any longer.

Imagine how stoked they are to have as their BPS spokesmodel an attractive, young, female 'scientist'. They're not letting go of such a PR bonanza so easily.

Oh good grief, read this gem: "you are told not to tell anyone about the LP as it won't work if you do. " wtaf! :wtf::confused:

Wow, good catch, @Esther12 . Can't believe we all missed that until now. It's like someone spiked the punch over there in Bristol :alien:

I know this is OT for the main point of this hot scientific mess, but all I could think of when reading about that idiotic "study" and the author's pompous assertions about it was the high number of women who routinely give fake phone numbers and fake ages to random a-holes on the street giving...

Habitual liars absolutely start to believe their own lies--which is why they can lie so boldly and readily. One lie builds on another, and another and another, until the whole fabulous mess is as real to them as their own hand.

Interesting to note that the wording was "it is my understanding" regarding the alleged senior-level discussion. This is more vague wording that could mean something or nothing at all. Could be true, could be face-saving bs. Either way, that David has never heard about it is the neon sign.

Limiting naps to 30 minutes a day? Where did they scrounge that scrap of misinfo from? If I could only manage *to* nap during the day, I'd be delighted no matter how long or short it were. I cannot manage to sleep during the day no matter how utterly exhausted I am, unless I am having a viral...

Don't feel bad, even scientists find it complex, as they are quick to point out in the paper below :nerd: Neither do I have expertise in this subject, but there are a few pearls in this paper which might help clarify how you may have shifted to converting glutamine back into glutamate, which is...

Can someone clarify what they mean by "early-onset"? Do they mean long-term patients, or newly-ill?