£17m from Wellcome to analyse NHS talking therapy outcomes

Sly Saint

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Ben Goldacre is heavily involved in this.

Major investment to transform mental health treatment research and further develop secure NHS data platform
Department researchers awarded £17 million from Wellcome to analyse NHS talking therapy outcomes and enhance secure data research. The project will enable unprecedented mental health treatment research through the OpenSAFELY platform.

Researchers at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences' Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science have received two major awards from Wellcome: £7 million to support groundbreaking research into mental health treatment outcomes, and a £10 million investment in new techniques for secure access to NHS data for research.

The first award will, for the first time, enable researchers to analyse anonymised NHS Talking Therapies data alongside GP records, in a highly secure setting. The Talking Therapies service is a major part of the NHS, delivering NICE-recommended psychological therapy for depression and anxiety disorders to over 670,000 patients in England each year. The therapies include cognitive-behaviour therapy, counselling, and guided self-help. Uniquely, outcome data is collected from 98% of people who have a course of treatment.

Incorporating this data into the OpenSAFELY platform will help answer many vital questions about mental health treatment, including:

  • How talking therapies affect long-term health outcomes
  • Which approaches work best for specific conditions and patient groups
  • The best way to deliver services
  • The relationship between mental health treatments and physical health
The research will build on the success of OpenSAFELY, the secure analytics platform developed at Oxford during the COVID-19 pandemic. OpenSAFELY has been delivering whole population data analysis, using innovative new methods to protect patients’ privacy while allowing researchers to conduct their research. The platform's findings directly informed UK public health policy decisions during the pandemic, particularly regarding protection for vulnerable groups.

Building on the Bennett Institute's existing collaboration with NHS England, the project will analyse outcome data from millions of patients who have used NHS Talking Therapies services while maintaining strict privacy controls. No identifying patient information leaves NHS systems, as all analysis takes place within the secure OpenSAFELY environment. Researchers design and write their analysis using randomly generated fake “dummy data”. They then submit it for automatic remote execution on the real patient data. This means that they don’t need to interact directly with real patient records. As part of the mental health project, OpenSAFELY and NHS England will also explore new mechanisms for data linkage, where datasets are minimised before moving between NHS England controlled data centres.

Professor Ben Goldacre, Director of the Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, based within the Nuffield department of Primary Care Health Sciences, who originally trained in psychiatry, said:

"This investment on mental health data will be transformative. Researchers will be able to systematically study which talking therapies work best for different people, using secure analysis of NHS GP data at unprecedented scale, for the first time. This has the potential to fundamentally change how we deliver mental health care to patients in the NHS. In addition, the £10m data infrastructure investment will allow us to drive better use of data across the whole research community. We are hugely grateful to Wellcome for making this possible."
Major investment to transform mental health treatment research and further develop secure NHS data platform — Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford


SMC expert reaction:
expert reaction to the announcement of the expansion of the OpenSAFELY data platform | Science Media Centre
 
I can't be the only one reading this and finding that it's obviously blatantly biased towards being marketing material, with about zero serious research. It's almost comical how it's written. It's not even marketing research, it's pure marketing. Every single sentence is framed in a way that assumes this is all very effective and that the 'researchers' are expected to validate this, that this is why they are getting this money, in exchange for which they will pad their academic resume.

And they're obviously spending a ridiculous sum precisely to create the kind of sunk cost that raises clear expectations of "find good things, only good things, make this sell like hot cakes". The level of bias here is frankly on par with banana republics doing "Dear Leader" type of fake research. And for sure they will marvel at how Dear Leader is the best golfer in history, literally scored a 18 on his first-ever round of gold and decided to retire because it's just not fair to other lesser beings.
 
Uniquely, outcome data is collected from 98% of people who have a course of treatment.


I seriously doubt that! I had some NHS funded talking therapy last year (not in anyway connected to NHS ME clinics, would not go near those!)

All that is offered is some version of CBT, so what are they comparing. I was asked for some feedback after completion but felt so negative that I didn't want to reply immediately. It wasn't chased up.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom