“Lumping” and “splitting” medically unexplained symptoms: is there a role for a transdiagnostic approach? - Chalder/Willis (2017)

MSEsperanza

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Trudie Chalder & Claire Willis (2017) “Lumping” and “splitting” medically unexplained symptoms: is there a role for a transdiagnostic approach?, Journal of Mental Health, 26:3, 187-191, DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1322187
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2017.1322187

(Open access)

Haven't read it, just saw it includes a "Proposed matrix: illustrated with fatigue as a transdiagnostic symptom" [for "IBS, CFS, Fibromylagia etc."]

(Table 2 in the text)
 
Trudie Chalder & Claire Willis (2017)
Haven't read it, just saw it includes a "Proposed matrix: illustrated with fatigue as a transdiagnostic symptom" [for "IBS, CFS, Fibromylagia etc."]
Claire Willis works at the Chronic Fatigue Research and Treatment Unit, London, UK
I gave up after reading about the "good evidence base" for CBT especially in CFS (ref PACE).
 
Last edited:
There is an extraordinarily frank figure in this paper, it really does reveal exactly what these people believe. Which is refreshing. They usually do such a nice dance around how we "don't really know" and that their proposed treatments take a "pragmatic" approach. But this figure tells it like it is.
temp.jpeg
 
People with untreated and significant illness are going to engage in "physical attributions", they're going to have beliefs on what helps and what harms which can be entirely correct ("fear avoidance beliefs"). They're going to have disturbed sleep (which can be interpreted as behaviour and labelled a poor sleep routine). They're going to try and get diagnosed and treated, and if the illness is a serious problems they won't easily give up. They're going to have symptoms that are too intense to just ignore, but that could get them labelled as focusing too much on symptoms (" "symptom focus"). They're of course going to worry as any responsible person would. And so on.

All these BPS proponents are doing is putting their own misantropic spin on the lives of people struggling with chronic illness. I sometimes think that we need a new term for this because it's the chronic illness equivalent of racism.
 
Last edited:
Isn't this an issue they should have given consideration to decades ago in their research careers?
Wessely and White had a gentlemanly "debate" on this in 2004.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8424117_There_is_only_one_functional_somatic_syndrome
I noticed that diagram and thought how impressive were the developments over the years - in the art-work. It says so much. And leaves so much un-said.
It's their sacred cow, sorry, mandala.
 
I had not yet heard of "rogue representations"

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311908.2015.1033876
Brown (2004) presents another multicomponent model for the development and maintenance of MUS. He proposes that MUS constitute an alteration in body image generated by “rogue representations” in the cognitive system. This model is based on a hierarchical cognitive model of attentional control proposed by Norman and Shallice (1986). Norman and Shallice described a higher level executive control system, the supervisory attentional system that, for the greater part, is localised in the prefrontal cortex. This system monitors ongoing activity and modulates behaviour when established automatic routines are not sufficient, for instance, in novel situations. Automatic routines are in their turn controlled by a hierarchical lower level control process, involving a series of well-learned behavioural units or schemata that can be activated by environmental and contextual stimuli through a decentralised and semi-autonomous process called “contention scheduling”.

In Brown’s integrated model, MUS arise when the lower level attentional process of contention scheduling selects rogue representations, which can be any kind of information concerning the nature of physical symptoms. These rogue representations can be acquired from many different sources, including personal exposure to a serious physical state (e.g. during periods of physical illness, or through traumatic experiences), exposure to physical states in others (e.g. abnormal levels of illness in the family environment), but also through sociocultural transmission or verbal suggestion. These experiences create memory traces that are functionally similar to those generated when the same symptoms are experienced in the self. The rogue representation selected by the primary attention system leads to the activation of the secondary attention system which involves selective attention to physical sensations, disease-confirming information and negative affect. These secondary attention processes facilitate reactivation of the rogue representation in the memory system (see also Rief & Broadbent, 2007).

Brown 2004: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15367081/
 
Last edited:
People with untreated and significant illness are going to engage in "physical attributions", they're going to have beliefs on what helps and what harms which can be entirely correct ("fear avoidance beliefs"). They're going to have disturbed sleep (which can be interpreted as behaviour and labelled a poor sleep routine). They're going to try and get diagnosed and treated, and if the illness is a serious problems they won't easily give up. They're going to have symptoms that are too intense to just ignore, but that could get them labelled as focusing too much on symptoms (" "symptom focus"). They're of course going to worry as any responsible person would. And so on.

All these BPS proponents are doing is putting their own misantropic spin on the lives of people struggling with chronic illness. I sometimes think that we need a new term for this because it's the chronic illness equivalent of racism.

This is a very accurate and succinct statement of their position. Exactly.

It's a good explanatory statement for anyone embedded in the psychological position (who are outside the actual cabal of researchers) and who seem incapable of imagining that there may be legitimate reasons for why we reject their BPS views.

I hope the sentiment of the statement gets taken up and sees a wider viewership.

And I don't think the chronic illness equivalent of racism or mysogyny or aporaphobia (hatred of the poor) is in any way exaggerated. It is that. They may not consciously be promoting it but that doesn't change what it is.
 
There is an extraordinarily frank figure in this paper, it really does reveal exactly what these people believe. Which is refreshing. They usually do such a nice dance around how we "don't really know" and that their proposed treatments take a "pragmatic" approach. But this figure tells it like it is.
View attachment 12219
This is just a bunch of random concepts with arrows thrown in without sense or reason. It reads exactly like those conspiracy webs that link cow manure and aliens, or whatever. You can link bin Laden to climate change with this approach, it's just someone putting their imagination to paper.

It's really absurd that this stuff, which should be a career-ender, is taken seriously.
 
Somatoform and Other Psychosomatic Disorders: A Dialogue Between Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Perspectives
"....rogue representations or, in other words, inappropriate information concerning the nature of the physical symptoms."

I can tell you how this goes when the patient is setting in the chair. I've been there. :banghead:
 
Back
Top Bottom