They seem to have not understood her point.
This would seem to be willful misunderstanding--responding to a point that wasn't made to get out of actually responding to the point that was made. ADDED: I see this point has been made.
They seem to have not understood her point.
It must be hard to be world famous for writing the worst Cochrane review ever.
Just for added fun, here's the latest correspondence I had with Wiley who said they were going to investigate my allegation of misconduct against the Editor in Chief. Not sure whether I will receive a response to my latest clarification. I have now explained about 17 times that Cochrane did not investigate the misconduct allegation because the Cochrane co-chairs decided that this allegation conveniently "overlapped" with an already investigated complaint that the review contained errors.
Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
I think he should enjoy his retirement. Maybe he can teach the ducks in the park how to waddle properly?James C Robertson
Ret. Consultant in Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Salisbury /Southampton
Still a member of BMA, FRCP
Salisbury
Aside from being a truly ridiculous level of both weird and wrong, what the hell does it even have to do with the topic at hand?I haven't found a mention of this on the thread (when searching for James C Robertson) but a most absurd response to Chronic fatigue syndrome: Outcry over Cochrane decision to abandon review of exercise therapy has been published
![]()
Chronic fatigue syndrome: Outcry over Cochrane decision to abandon review of exercise therapy
A decision to cancel a planned update of a Cochrane systematic review of exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome has met with anger from a group advising the review and the patient community. The decision has reignited calls for the review,1 which includes studies only up to May 2014, to...www.bmj.com
Re: Chronic fatigue syndrome: Outcry over Cochrane decision to abandon review of exercise therapy
Dear Editor,
The National Institute of Clinical Excellence ( Nice ) is right re fibromyalgia and ME in that physical lifestyle / ergonomics 24/7 which includes sleep style is the prime cause.
Scientifically this includes biomechanics and ergonomics and these apply to sleepstyle as much as to work and leisure. Children need to be taught and a consensus regarding detail is essential. Patterns of rest and movement are the key to prevention, as is knowledge of what can go wrong.
Just as for passing a driving test, everyone needs to know how to drive their carcasses /bodies and minds through each day and night. This whether they are managing a work force, or a school PT or biology teacher or a parent.
People with discomfort and pain may find that certain longer held postures may promote comfort and allow work and daily obligatory tasks to be performed, but on remobilising pain may occur eg on the walk to get to car train or bus. If these are crowded so standing may occur, sitting is avoided and so movement and posture changes while on the feet avoids neuropraxia. If sat on a seat which is well cushioned and upright then the sciatic nerves may be parked on the stretch. If the passenger then reads his paper or mobile with his forearms resting on his lap and head flexed the central nervous system and the peripheral will be stretched. If sat too still for too long a neuropraxia may occur and the return of the blood supply whille walking may be painful and clumsiness /accident proness may occur. For example a knee might give way and flex unexpectedly, and so avoid a pain but risk a fall and a sprained ankle.
James C Robertson
Ret. Consultant in Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Salisbury /Southampton
Still a member of BMA, FRCP
Salisbury
It is a bit obscure. His main topic seems to miss some logical consistencies such asAside from being a truly ridiculous level of both weird and wrong, what the hell does it even have to do with the topic at hand?
Dude clearly just wanted to rant a bit, although I can't make any sense of what he's trying to say, it's seriously embarrassing to be this irrelevant. This is one of those cases where BMJ should have just politely refused for being oddly off-topic. Or maybe published it as some standalone rant, for some reason.
I don't even know what the equivalent would be for a programmer. It's just stupendously impertinent.