1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for 'CFS'.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 4th November 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! Read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum.
    Dismiss Notice

4 Dec | Oral evidence to UK Commons Select Committee on research integrity - live on Parliament TV?

Discussion in 'Research methodology news and research' started by Sasha, Dec 3, 2017.

Tags:
  1. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,006
    Location:
    UK
    Code:
    https://twitter.com/CommonsSTC/status/936602832593149952
    https://twitter.com/user/status/936602832593149952


    Code:
    https://twitter.com/ivanoransky/status/936231793786793985
    https://twitter.com/user/status/936231793786793985


    ParliamentLive TV (not sure if that's what IO means) is online here: http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Commons

    and on actual TV here:

    Sky (UK only): Channel 504
    Virgin Media (UK): Channel 605
    Freeview: Channel 232
    Freesat: Channel 201
     
    Sasha, Dec 3, 2017
    #1
    ladycatlover, Woolie, Barry and 7 others like this.
  2. guest001

    guest001 Guest

    I'm not sure one would use the word 'integrity' wrt Goldacre given he won't point the finger at his mukkers over PACE.
     
    guest001, Dec 3, 2017
    #2
    ladycatlover, Woolie, Barry and 7 others like this.
  3. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    Sile Lane from Sense About Science is another dodgy one too. Looks like it could be dominated by those who merely present as being committed to research integrity.
     
    Esther12, Dec 3, 2017
    #3
    ladycatlover, Barry, Valentijn and 6 others like this.
  4. Joel

    Joel Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    941
    Location:
    UK
    This pretty much sums it up for me. Anyone can say that they are about research integrity, high standards, transparency etc. but words are cheap and when you look at what people actually do in terms of actions and in-actions, in some cases you see a contrasting picture. Good to see a committee looking at these issues but it's likely to be limited by its input. Can the public have any input?
     
    Joel, Dec 3, 2017
    #4
    ladycatlover, Barry, Valentijn and 3 others like this.
  5. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    They say:

    http://www.parliament.uk/business/c...ies/parliament-2017/research-integrity-17-19/
     
    Esther12, Dec 3, 2017
    #5
    ladycatlover, Barry, Valentijn and 3 others like this.
  6. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,563
    Location:
    UK
    There were minutes from the MRC published somewhere (I think as an appendix in a welfare report) where Sile Lane and MRC representatives signed up to saying that FoI and parliamentary questions were harassment. I assume she will give the same message to the select committee that if they ask questions that is harassing researchers.
     
    Adrian, Dec 3, 2017
    #6
    ladycatlover, Barry, guest001 and 4 others like this.
  7. Joel

    Joel Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    941
    Location:
    UK
    :emoji_laughing:
     
    Joel, Dec 3, 2017
    #7
    ladycatlover, Barry, Valentijn and 1 other person like this.
  8. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,420
    What, that bunch of troublemakers! :rolleyes:
     
    Barry, Dec 3, 2017
    #8
    MeSci, Joel, ladycatlover and 2 others like this.
  9. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    23,034
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    http://www.parliament.uk/business/c...ws-parliament-2017/research-integrity4-17-19/
     
    Andy, Jan 31, 2018
    #9
    Barry, Invisible Woman and Valentijn like this.

Share This Page