A retrospective observational study .. somatosensory amplification in [FM], chronic pain, psychiatric disorders & healthy subjects, 2020, Ciaramella

Discussion in ''Conditions related to ME/CFS' news and research' started by Andy, Nov 4, 2020.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    23,010
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Full title: A retrospective observational study comparing somatosensory amplification in fibromyalgia, chronic pain, psychiatric disorders and healthy subjects
    Paywall, https://www.degruyter.com/view/jour...020-0103/article-10.1515-sjpain-2020-0103.xml
    Sci hub, no access
     
    MEMarge and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  2. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,050
    Location:
    Australia
    Somatosensory amplification (SA) has been described as an important feature of somatoform disorders, and an “amplifying somatic style” has been reported as a negative connotation of body perception.

    Gotta admit, they are experts at bootstrapping. :thumbsdown:
     
  3. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,651
    Location:
    Canada
    This wouldn't even get a pass grade in high school. There are multiple layers of assumptions all built on one another. Most B movie plots are more consistent than this.
    I see that peer review is now a mere theatrical performance. Why even bother at this point? Just publish the conclusions alone with nothing else to support it, it clearly makes no difference.

    The combination of obsessive overreliance on questionnaires and a pathological inability to reliably ask relevant questions is, unsurprisingly, very bad. I don't know if it's a sampling issue but about 99% of all research in this field is completely inept. It isn't just a large number, it's an overwhelming proportion.
     
    alktipping, Sean, JemPD and 3 others like this.
  4. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,999
    Location:
    Belgium
    That suggests the SSAS isn't measuring what the name suggests it should be measuring.

    Does anyone have a link to the questionnaire?
     
    alktipping, Amw66 and Andy like this.
  5. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,651
    Location:
    Canada
    It appears even more ridiculous than I feared: https://bpsmedicine.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1751-0759-1-17.
    The statements:
    There is more interpretation to those statements than a typical art history class, or an interpretive dance recital. They are completely ambiguous and could be rated in so many ways. It's hard to reconcile that this junk is taken seriously.

    I guess this is one way to turn the ink blot test into a questionnaire form.
     
    Sean, MEMarge, alktipping and 6 others like this.
  6. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,651
    Location:
    Canada
    What a joke. Literally 2 points separating typical and "high somatization" on a 50 point scale.

    Basically this is rated like a shower water temperature knob, all the sensitivity is located in a narrow middle band.

    Crisis of validity. This is not a problem of replicability. This is absurdly invalid. This whole field is a sick joke.
     
    Sean, MEMarge, alktipping and 3 others like this.
  7. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    14,824
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    Ooh yes those various things happening within in the body can be very debilitating :banghead:
     
    MEMarge, alktipping, rvallee and 2 others like this.
  8. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,766
    What in earth happens to medics when they train as psychiatrists?
     
    MEMarge and alktipping like this.

Share This Page