I think Marco was referring to the suggestion I had made in the post he quoted.
We need an experimental neuropsychologist. Maybe
@Woolie would know?
@Jonathan Edwards, I'm guessing you're referring to the idea of doing some sort of masking study in PwME?
But what if a blockage in nerve cell function actually meant that PWME retained things that healthy people did not? What if paradoxically the blockage left a trace that allowed a response that healthy brains could not make? It might be in terms of what neuropsychologists call 'masking' in visual experiments. Or imprinting with a subliminal stimulus.. In lots of experiments people are asked to respond to a picture having had various other visual stimuli flashed subconsciously either before or after so that the brain's response is distorted. Maybe in ME some of these effects might go on for longer?
It is just a speculation and it might well be wrong but it might just show something interesting. Everyone assumes that cognitive tests in ME should just show a deficit. But if there was a paradoxical extra or enhanced effect, however useless in practice, it could be a powerful clue to what is wrong.
Masking is when you show someone a visual stimulus (like a printed word, let's say "cat") and then a fraction of a second afterwards, you show some meaningless image in the area where the word just appeared (say "XXXX"). The person is often unable to report that they saw a word at all. But you can show with response time tasks that they are nonetheless influenced by the word, For example, if you ask them to repeat the word "dog" shortly afterwards, they will be faster, compared to when they were presented with an unrelated word like "bed".
It isn't really a "neural" effect, its better understood as a feature of human cognitive functioning. We need quite a lot of exposure time for something to reach our awareness (a few hundred milliseconds). This is sometimes called "integration time". If we have less than that, we still process the stimulus to some extent - enough to influence how we respond to the very next stimulus - just not enough to report it. The effect doesn't last long. If you wait a second or so, then you won't see any sign that the person ever viewed the word cat at all.
Usually, a mask has to be shown within 150 milliseconds or so of a stimulus ("cat") to prevent us from "seeing" the stimulus. You might expect that any condition that slows cognition - including ME - that period could be a bit longer. This would be expected because "integration time" is slowed. It wouldn't necessarily mean that PwMEs are retaining a "trace" longer than healthies. It just means that they are processing the visual stimulus information more slowly.
The sort of thing neuropsychologists measure when they are studying perception - maybe with a tachistoscope! Effects of flash images on recall and choices maybe, but maybe something a bit different from the usual routine. We need an experimental neuropsychologist.
You don't need a tachistoscope any more. A simple Macbook will suffice. There are plenty of freeware programmes that can be used to present this sort of timed display.
If you want a cognitive task that would be sensitive to cognitive PEM, I wouldn't choose something as complex as masked priming, there are too many variables that could be responsible for any effect. I would choose a speeded task, something like responding to simple letters with a button press. You can vary the timing and other parameters in order to get measures of various things, such as sustained attention, response speed, etc.
I think response speed might be what you want, because speed is a sensitive measure, and because damage to the anterior cingulate results in a general slowing of response times. People think the anterior cingulate might function as an "interface" between the brain and the autonomic nervous system (ANS). It signals to the ANS when high performance of some kind is required, and the ANS responds by increasing heart rate variability, etc. If the task is a cognitive one, these changes will increase blood flow to the participating brain regions. I suspect that in ME, there might be a lack of responsiveness of this kind - due to problems outside of the central nervous system entirely - so the brain is not able to respond to cognitive challenges in the normal way.
So I'm saying in ME, the anterior cingulate is working fine, but the ANS/cardiovascular system cannot respond effectively. But the same tasks that are sensitive to anterior cingulate damage might also pick up the problems in PwME.
I think its interesting how PwMEs seem to vary in how much cognitive versus physical PEM they have. And its interesting that people say cognitive tasks generate cognitive PEM and physical tasks generate physical PEM. Still think, though, that ANS and cardiovascular variables like OI might be at the bottom of all that variation.