"Answer to IBS is in the mind" - media coverage of new Chalder/Moss-Morris trial

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science...bowel-syndrome-psychological-new-study-shows/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...rapy-cure-IBS-better-drugs-study-reveals.html

https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/uk-news/talking-therapy-better-drugs-irritable-16108042

Press release with a link to the paper for when embargo has lifted (it seems it hasn't yet). Note the use of selected anecdotes from trial participants - this way they get to choose the voice of patients: https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-04/uos-ccp041019.php

This is the trial: https://www.southampton.ac.uk/psychology/research/projects/actib.page

ISRCTN registration only mentions self-report questionnaires as outcomes: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN44427879?q=&filters=recruitmentCountry:United Kingdom,conditionCategoryigestive System&sort=&offset=89&totalResults=319&page=1&pageSize=100&searchType=basic-search

Given the media coverage, Science Media Centre spin wouldn't surprise me, but no sign of it yet.

Edited additions:

Science Media Centre: http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/c...therapy-cbt-for-irritable-bowel-syndrome-ibs/

BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-47884038

And Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/apr/11/therapy-phone-online-help-people-ibs-study

Are we now going to get some pained articles about "all we did was conduct a trial likely to exaggerate any benefits of psychological therapies and then promote our results to the media with anecdotes about how life-changing our treatment was... how could that have led to appalling headlines about how the answer to IBS is 'in the mind'?!"

Editing in some new (to me) coverage:


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8838369/ibs-psychological-treatment-mental-training/

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/ibs-irritable-bowel-syndrome-cbt-therapy-nhs-a8864156.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/en...earchers-think-so_uk_5caefbece4b0a983fce462d0

Something from the NHS's Behind the Scenes that mentions problems with drop-out, but nothing else:

https://www.nhs.uk/news/lifestyle-a...ptoms-irritable-bowel-syndrome-reports-study/

 

Front page of the Telegraph!

Whoever would have guessed that a study by Prof Chalder would conclude that CBT is an effective treatment. I wonder if someone could do a study to determine whether her unhelpful beliefs can be reversed with CBT. Perhaps Prof Chalder could conduct the study herself.

The Chalder Paradox: Is CBT an effective treatment for reversing unhelpful beliefs about the effectiveness of CBT? I think maybe we should write this up as a spoof paper.

 

Surely the answer to everything is in the mind?

It's almost definitely not in that rock over there, or that blade of grass next to it, or in a toenail.

These things do not contain answers, they don't even contain questions.

Only minds can come up with and understand answers, so the answer to everything must, by definition, be in the mind.

I'm much more interested in that tap that can do 'everything', also on the front page, that probably can't even tap dance whilst baking a nice cake. False advertising or what.

 

has @#meaction considered a program of connecting with ibs charities, and charities representing every other population that is being attacked? @JaimeS?

for example an email list that charities are subscribed to that has petitions that can be signed [at their option] + press kits in response to and anticipation of attacks.

and also a program for educating one another. i /don't want/ to keep seeing disease after disease and disease-state after disease-state being attacked and not being active.

 

Here's the Science Media Centre info on their briefing: http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/c...therapy-cbt-for-irritable-bowel-syndrome-ibs/

No mention of an expert reaction section though.

 

So whilst it might be said, by some, that CBT is more effective than treatment that had been shown over at least a year not to work, what it definitively doesn't show is that CBT is more effective than IBS treatment that works.

Which is the implication in the headline.

It's not even an implication, it's a statement.

Then of course there's the whole phone, internet treatment thing, which I believe has been discussed before.

 

Never liked tripe.

 

Given the amount we get fed every day that's quite unfortunate.

 

Has she never heard of Celiac ? Lactate intolerance? etc. What about the Pret incident? Almost all allergies start with IBS along with cancer of the bowel? If Pret can be torn apart then this research has to be held accountable for the suffering and deaths it will cause?

On average it takes 13 years to be diagnosed with Celiac and by that time all the villi can be burnt to such a degree they no longer can or will take any vitamins or minerals in. This is vital to know for very young children.

Allergic asthma, rhinitis, and eczema go hand-in-hand with diarrhea and bad digestive reactions to food in certain people with IBS, researchers say. "The thinking is that if you can figure out their food allergies, you can really improve their diarrhea and abdominal pain.12 Nov 2015

 

Keith's on the case...
https://twitter.com/user/status/1116232056030232576


I noted that when describing their outcome measures, they say "IBS-SSS is widely used in IBS studies and a 50-point within-participant change from baseline regarded as clinically significant," and then go on to look at 35 pt improvement in group means instead. While there may in fact be little difference between 'diff in group means' and 'means of individual diffs', it's better to look at the latter if your aim is to achieve individual improvement.

I'd like to see the proportions of patients who achieved this 50-pt improvement in each group. I'd also like to see the manuals and the questionnaires to see if they've been 'outcome training' on specific questions from the IBS questionnaires.

The scope for harm is much less here than in ME/CFS CBT trials, unless of course CBT says that "avoiding certain foods because they exacerbate symptoms" is an unhelpful illness belief. Though this quote from the Guardian article was fairly stunning:

 

I haven't read all the articles but in the Mail one it says:

so if there were any improvements how do they know it is not due to a change in diet?

eta:
from the eurekalert article

more empire building

 

of course we could have plenty of people in there that don’t actually have IBS. Just judging by the amount of wrong attribution of symptoms to diet I would imagine that they had rich pickings in the selection of the cohort to give them the outcome they wanted.

What next ...cure for wheat and dairy intolerance? I can see the headlines now

“miracle cure for my crippling bloating”

Wally had been avoiding gluten ever since he realised that the bun in his burger and chips left him feeling bloated.

After one telephone session of CBT with some advice on nutrition he now leads a normal life. “I couldn’t believe it ...it’s almost like my mind cured me....I feel less bloated and I’ve lost a few pounds too” says Wally of Little Wasting

 

OK - they did look at this:

"Ninety-nine of 136 (72.8%) participants had a clinically significant change in IBS-SSS (≧50 points) from baseline to 12 months in TCBT compared with 82/124 (66.1%) in WCBT and 58/131 (44.3%) in TAU."

But my point about possible 'outcome training' is still relevant here.

 

Here's the URL to the paper...

https://gut.bmj.com/content/early/2019/03/26/gutjnl-2018-317805

Not had time to read it yet, not sure if I can be bothered.

Oh, and I thought I had IBS for years, but was finally diagnosed with probable diverticulitis at St Thomas Hospital (London) walk in centre (treated with antibiotics), diverticulosis later confirmed by CT colonoscopy back in Liverpool. I wonder if they excluded diverticulosis in their patients.