Good feedback. Thank you.
I totally understand the need for a scientific approach to this. I’m just concerned that this is shunned due to the perception of “bleach” (related media to that) and that there hasn’t been any research papers in to whether it is efficacious. USA Today study only says “no research to support the claim” - which I agree with but why is that research not being done?
This means the only “evidence” out there is the blogs online but there seem to be more and more people saying it works for them (the one I posted was just one example).
Interestingly while writing this I found this journal article (not looked at peer review) but something at least:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.841310/full
“Guan et al. (37) examined the effects of a H2/O2mixed gas (67% H2, 33% O2) on patients with COVID-19 by an open-label multicenter clinical trial and showed that the improvements in disease severity, dyspnea, cough, chest distress, chest pain, and oxygen saturation were significantly greater in H2/O2 treatment group (44 patients) than those in control group (46 patients)”
Seems to indicate that there could be something in this? However perhaps in H2/O2 form instead.
But it is what bleach is?
This is what is used to bleach hair. It can bleach teeth. It will bleach clothes if it drops on them etc. It smells of bleach even when it is a very weak solution in a mouthwash
As there are warnings for example about using too much too often even as a mouthwash then I suspect that might be a good place to look for research as there are likely connections there with regards to the harm done / links to issues?