Article : The Trump Administration Wants to Snoop on Disabled Americans

Arnie Pye

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
If you apply for disability insurance under the Social Security Administration, you might want to stay off Instagram.

The Trump White House and the Social Security Administration (SSA) have a new scheme to expand the federal government’s ability to snoop on the social media accounts of disabled Americans. The plan, which appears in this year’s SSA budget proposal (and was first reported on by the New York Times), hinges on the government’s ability to scoop up pictures and posts that might reveal whether someone is faking a disability. The budget also calls for cuts to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) — not the first such proposal under the Trump administration. The new program is designed to solve a problem — widespread disability fraud — that experts say does not exist. In fact, there is no evidence of such large-scale malfeasance. Trying to adjudicate disability by monitoring social media will be, at best, an exercise in bias confirmation and, at worst, will represent a major expansion of the surveillance state, focused on some of America’s most vulnerable citizens.

SSDI provides a small amount of monthly financial support — the average is about $1,200 — for individuals ruled sufficiently disabled, based on one’s ability to work and the severity of a relevant condition. Standards to qualify for SSDI are already extremely high (arguably too high); many disabled people who cannot work have had to wait years to receive the benefit. While fraud does of course occur, it’s rare: The Washington Post reports that the SSA administered $8.1 billion in fraudulent payments between 2011 and 2015 — just over 1 percent of total disability outlays. (By contrast, last year the Pentagon admitted it couldn’t account for hundreds of billions, possibly trillions, of dollars.)

Article continues here :

https://medium.com/s/story/the-trum...s-to-snoop-on-disabled-americans-f2fcaae78ad3

What is described in this article is, I think, already familiar to disabled people in the UK. There has been an assumption for years amongst the Powers That Be in the UK that everyone claiming any form of social security payments is a fraud, despite there being very little evidence of fraud in reality.

What percentage of benefit payments do you think is lost to fraud?

A survey in 2013 by Ipsos Mori suggested people believed that £24 out of every £100 spent on benefits was fraudulently claimed.

What do you think - too high, too low?

Want to know the real answer?

It's £1.10 in every £100.

Source : https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-39980793

I don't know how many members are from the US and whether this is even relevant to those that there are, but thought I'd pass it on.
 
But they donate money to politicians to do their bidding.
This is just yet another veiled attempt to kick everyone off public assistance.
If disabled people widely stop participating in social media, this is also a way to shut down our freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.

We may need to create an online privacy and anonymity thread should this scheme come to pass.
 
Last edited:
If disabled people widely stop participating in social media, this is also a way to shut down our freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.

We may need to create an online privacy and anonymity thread should this scheme come to pass.
I agree but when your in territory occupied by the enemy you have to choose your moves very carefully :(
Thats one reason why they packed the supreme court, the right to free speech won't prevail when they choose to interpret their own laws to benefit their rich donors over the disabled poor.
If you tried to sue under freedom of speech to be disabled and use social media without government surveillance and sanction you might be correct but you would definitely lose today
 
Last edited:
Frankly it seems like the best solution for the vast majority of people's ideological preferences is free health care and universal basic income. The safety net everybody wants with the greatest bureaucratic simplicity and least state monitoring.

Unfortunately, there are plenty of idiots in the UK who want to get rid of the NHS. And I don't think they are all rich either. They are probably people who have been healthy all their lives and have never had to worry about the cost of healthcare.

Sadly, the NHS is collapsing through lack of funding and lack of medical staff. When Brexit goes through, and then a trade deal with the Americans goes through, the Americans will muscle in on the NHS and we'll have a system just like the American one. Of all the healthcare systems in the world the UK could have copied, our government appears keen to copy the most expensive, most inefficient, most unfair, and most complicated one in the world, presumably because the people who can afford to invest in healthcare companies will make the most profit.
 
Unfortunately, there are plenty of idiots in the UK who want to get rid of the NHS. And I don't think they are all rich either. They are probably people who have been healthy all their lives and have never had to worry about the cost of healthcare.

Sadly, the NHS is collapsing through lack of funding and lack of medical staff. When Brexit goes through, and then a trade deal with the Americans goes through, the Americans will muscle in on the NHS and we'll have a system just like the American one. Of all the healthcare systems in the world the UK could have copied, our government appears keen to copy the most expensive, most inefficient, most unfair, and most complicated one in the world, presumably because the people who can afford to invest in healthcare companies will make the most profit.

I hope your government (or lack of) doesn't adopt our hodge-podge system of healthcare. But troubling to me is how institutional psychiatrists were able, in the NHS, to pull a Crowley, a Sharp, etc. Makes me worried about NHS over here in the USA.

Slight change of subject: is there a chance for a quick no-Brexit referendum, or am still dreaming.
 
Back
Top Bottom