Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study, 2025, Weaver

Dolphin

Senior Member (Voting Rights)

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Health Serv., 27 June 2025

Sec. Implementation Science

Volume 5 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1562651

Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study​

Stephanie Sargent WeaverStephanie Sargent Weaver1*
Monique Carry
Monique Carry2Jeanne BertolliJeanne Bertolli1Job Godino,Job Godino3,4Bruce StrumingerBruce Struminger5Douglas TarenDouglas Taren6John D. ScottJohn D. Scott7Sydney P. SharpSydney P. Sharp4Jane SamaniegoJane Samaniego4
Donna R. Bean
Donna R. Bean8Anindita IssaAnindita Issa1Jin-Mann S. LinJin-Mann S. Lin1Elizabeth R. UngerElizabeth R. Unger1
Christian B. Ramers
Christian B. Ramers4
  • 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Chronic Viral Diseases Branch, Atlanta, GA, United States
  • 2Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Global Health Center, HIV Prevention Branch, Atlanta, GA, United States
  • 3Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
  • 4Laura Rodriguez Research Institute, Family Health Centers of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
  • 6Department of Pediatrics, Nutrition Section, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
  • 7Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
  • 8PHI/CDC Global Health Fellowship Program, Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA, United States
Long COVID, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and other poorly understood post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS) can present with unexplained symptoms or conditions that may be misunderstood by healthcare providers, causing delays in diagnosis and care.

To address these issues, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program (LC&FIRP), initiated as a pilot project to assess whether providing tele-mentoring and other online education for primary care providers could help them improve the quality of life and support the recovery of their patients with these conditions.

The LC&FIRP multi-disciplinary team-based care approach is built on the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) learning model, which is an evidence-based virtual learning framework developed by the University of New Mexico and designed to disseminate and implement best practices, especially in under-resourced areas.

A distinctive feature of LC&FIRP was the inclusion of lived-experience experts.

To explore the influence of lived-experience experts on the care patients received, we collected the educational recommendations provided by the lived-experience experts during webinar sessions (January 2022—March 2024) and grouped these by themes.

The major themes that emerged included validation of patients’ illness experience; attitudes and beliefs about Long COVID, ME/CFS, and PAIS; understanding patients’ challenges and communicating with empathy; navigating referrals; recognizing and supporting disability; and supporting self-care.

Investigators also interviewed patients of the Family Health Centers of San Diego (FHCSD) about their experiences receiving care from participating primary care providers and employed content analysis methods to code interview transcripts to identify themes among patients’ perspectives.

Positive comments from the patients about topics emphasized by the lived-experience experts provided evidence of providers’ uptake and application of the experts’ recommendations and support the value of involving lived-experience experts in medical education to improve health services.
 
It would be useful to know what «the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program (LC&FIRP)» actually teaches, especially when there are no evidence-based treatments for either LC or ME/CFS.
 
What care?! This is presenteeism theater!
When physical symptoms cannot be detected or explained by current biomedical knowledge and technology, good provider-patient partnerships are crucial
Not if it leads to nothing! I don't give a flying fig about "provider-patient partnerships" if it makes zero difference! This is the opposite of crucial! I am unable to find things to say about this circle jerk that don't end up in exclamation points!!
 
Back
Top Bottom