Australia’s Health Minister Greg Hunt announces $3m for medical research

Patient4Life said:
ugh...it would be a shame if they got the money. Their biomarker research is ridiculous. In the US, no researchers are heralding their "discovery".
Click to expand...

They actually have done a lot of neuro imaging stuff (Barnden) and are at least looking at a variety of angles. They are also ready to talk to the newspapers about how bad the illness/that it's real etc.. So they have definitely done some good.
 
@hixxy
There is a danger of that and we can see UNSW gearing up, releasing a review recently calling for more biopsychosocial studies into ‘mecfs’ (although they don’t use the Canadian Consensus Criteria).
 
Last edited:
This is the second recommendation from the NHMRC ME/CFS Advisory Committee which has been implemented, which is really encouraging, given that the committee’s final report hasn’t been released yet. The first was for a health economics study: https://www.grants.gov.au/?event=public.GO.show&GOUUID=8E688A94-D501-6184-7128C473FE3CD789

This has truly been a community effort. In addition to the committee’s work, many advocates have written letters to MPs and had meetings with politicians (with several meeting with Hunt). The combined efforts have paid off!
 
Simone said:
This is the second recommendation from the NHMRC ME/CFS Advisory Committee which has been implemented, which is really encouraging, given that the committee’s final report hasn’t been released yet. The first was for a health economics study: https://www.grants.gov.au/?event=public.GO.show&GOUUID=8E688A94-D501-6184-7128C473FE3CD789

This has truly been a community effort. In addition to the committee’s work, many advocates have written letters to MPs and had meetings with politicians (with several meeting with Hunt). The combined efforts have paid off!
Click to expand...
Thanks Simone and everyone for their efforts!
 
This is very good news.

In pounds It’s equivalent to £1.6 m of state funds for research. Australia has a population of just under 1/3 of UK (23m), so it’s quite a large sum. In proportion UK should be investing £4m and the USA £20m odd (I think)

We need several countries having a significant research effort to make proper progress. They’re doing what our MRC refuse, putting up money to stimulate research interest which imo is obviously the right thing to do.

Edited for Australian dollars not US.
Edited to note the 1% prevalence rate quoted in article
 
Last edited:
Andy said:
It's not been allocated yet. As I understand it, it is a $3 million pot of cash that researchers will be able to put proposals forwards, asking for funding from that pot.
Click to expand...

Yep, that’s exactly right.

A worst case scenario would be for someone like Andrew Lloyd to get a grant from this, but at the very least we know he won’t get all of it, because it will be multiple grants. And, hopefully, the emphasis in the ME/CFS Advisory Committee’s report itself (that NHMRC funding should prioritise biomedical research and use CCC to select patients) will make it more difficult for psychosocial researchers to be successful in getting a grant from this.
 
Last edited:
I presume/hope that a commitment is being sought from the Labor party to match or better this. I am guessing minister Hunt's announcement won't be set in stone before the May election so may be overturned in the somewhat likely event that they lose. Getting Labor on board now seems vital.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom