Cerebrospinal fluid immune phenotyping reveals distinct immunotypes of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, 2025, Bastos et al

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by Nightsong, May 16, 2025.

  1. Nightsong

    Nightsong Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,172
    Abstract:
    Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex heterogeneous multiorgan disease that can have severe impact on individuals' quality of life. Diagnosis of ME/CFS is based on symptom presentation, and a significant goal for the field is to establish meaningful subtypes. The heterogeneity in the literature suggests that individuals living with ME/CFS may suffer from overlapping but different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

    We enrolled 40 participants with ME/CFS and 41 matched healthy control subjects at the Bragée Clinic in Sweden. We assessed plasma samples from both ME/CFS cases and control groups and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from individuals with ME/CFS. We investigated dysregulated pathways and disease profiles through clinical questionnaires; multiplex analyses of cytokines, hormones, and matrix metalloproteinases; pathogen seroreactivity through peptide display bacteria libraries; and high-throughput microarray for autoantibodies. All samples used were from humans.

    We show altered interaction patterns between circulating biological factors in plasma of ME/CFS participants. Our analysis of CSF from individuals with ME/CFS revealed different immunotypes of disease. We found 2 patient clusters based on matrix metalloproteinases profiles. The subgroups had similar clinical presentation but distinct pathogen exposure and CSF inflammatory profiles. Our findings shed light on ME/CFS immune phenotypes and generate hypotheses for future research in disease pathogenesis and treatment development by exploring disease subgroups.

    Link | PDF (The Journal of Immunology, May 2025, open access)
     
    Lilas, Kitty, forestglip and 3 others like this.
  2. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    17,612
    Location:
    London, UK
    They say nothing in the abstract about any differences from normal controls so maybe there weren't any?
     
  3. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,062
    Location:
    UK
    They do briefly mention some differences in the paper

    And fig 2 seems to show some differences - but I'm not convinced I'm understanding what they are saying.

    I seem to remember Lipkin did some analysis of CSF.
     
    Deanne NZ, Yann04, alktipping and 2 others like this.
  4. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,382
    Location:
    Belgium
    Wrote a brief summary on social media:
    https://twitter.com/user/status/1924407954670846155


    1) Interesting collaboration between the Iwasaki team and the Bragée clinic in Sweden. Their conclusion: "when evaluating previous pathogen exposure, we found that ME/CFS and healthy individuals did not differ in exposure to most assessed pathogens."

    2) The authors used the serum epitope repertoire analysis (SERA) assay in 39 ME/CFS patients and 40 controls. SERA leverages a database of thousands of infected vs. seronegative control subjects to determine past exposure to a pathogen using antibody repertoires.

    3) The study also screened autoantibody reactivities. For 57 out of 118 antigens, significantly higher IgM autoantibody reactivities were detected in healthy individuals compared to participants with ME/CFS. So reactivity was LOWER in ME/CFS but effect sizes were quite small.

    4) The rest of the paper focuses on subgrouping ME/CFS patients based on cerebrospinal fluid analysis (which unfortunately was not measured in control subjects).
     
    Deanne NZ, Lilas, Mij and 8 others like this.
  5. mango

    mango Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,046
    The problematic aspects of the diagnostics at Bragée ME Center have been discussed on this forum before, and also the various subgroups that Bragée ME Center made up very early on and added onto the ICD code in the patients' medical records.

    Just quickly mentioning it here, because a lot of people who wouldn't have gotten a ME diagnosis from the previous biomed ME clinics in Sweden, such as Stora Sköndal, have been diagnosed with ME by Bragée.

    This means that there is a lot (a lot!) more heterogenity among patients with a ME diagnosis in Sweden nowadays, compared to before Bragée ME Center existed. It's very noticeable to those of us who have been active in the patient community for a long time.

    Or in other words, to be blunt, I'm not so sure that all the people who have been diagnosed with ME by Bragée ME Center would receive the same diagnosis from other ME specialists based on diagnostic criteria like CCC and similar. It's something worth being aware of, I think.
     
    obeat, Trish, Deanne NZ and 7 others like this.
  6. ahimsa

    ahimsa Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,032
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    I think this article is about the paper in this thread:

    PolyBio and WE&ME supported study identifies two distinct ME/CFS subtypes
     
    Binkie4, wigglethemouse and Deanne NZ like this.
  7. wigglethemouse

    wigglethemouse Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,215
    Highlighting the following given discussion elsewhere on possible neuron/immune involvement in ME/CFS.
     
    Sean likes this.
  8. Kiristar

    Kiristar Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    214
    ahimsa and Trish like this.

Share This Page