large donner
Guest
OK I agree that there are some situations where there are problems and they very much relate to ME but I cannot see why isolating people to keep them from infecting others - which would involve no more than keeping them on their own should be an issue. It is not an issue of patient's rights or even of personal rights. It is something that is necessary to protect others and for pandemics the rights of others are the most important.
Presumably the people taken away to be "isolated" will be isolated around health care workers many of whom have died according to the reports we are being given. So exactly how low risk is such a situation.
Presumably health care workers take public transport and go to shops etc and are just as much or even more risk than a family isolating in their own house. If one person in a family gets infected the whole family can decide not to go out unlike a key worker health care worker in an isolation unit. Just what is the point of placing more burden on the health care system for an "infected" person until/unless that person actually needs medical care. Infected doesn't even necessarily mean particularly ill in the vast majority of cases. To date there are 148,000 confirmed cases and 20,319 deaths.
That would mean some 100,000 potentially being isolated and serviced at any given time outside of their own homes.
Exactly how much harder is it for a person to be isolated in a room in a family house away from other family members than in a state isolation unit when they already an isolation unit at home called a bedroom.
Last edited: