[CPET] in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Survivors: Evidence of a Sustained Exercise Intolerance and Hypermetabolism, 2021, Joris et al

Andy

Retired committee member
Full title: Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Survivors: Evidence of a Sustained Exercise Intolerance and Hypermetabolism

Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To investigate exercise capacity at 3 and 6 months after a prolonged ICU stay.

DESIGN:
Observational monocentric study.

SETTING:
A post-ICU follow-up clinic in a tertiary university hospital in Liège, Belgium.

PATIENTS:
Patients surviving an ICU stay greater than or equal to 7 days for a severe coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia and attending our post-ICU follow-up clinic.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
Cardiopulmonary and metabolic variables provided by a cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer were collected at rest, at peak exercise, and during recovery. Fourteen patients (10 males, 59 yr [52–62 yr], all obese with body mass index > 27 kg/m2) were included after a hospital stay of 40 days (35–53 d). At rest, respiratory quotient was abnormally high at both 3 and 6 months (0.9 [0.83–0.96] and 0.94 [0.86–0.97], respectively). Oxygen uptake was also abnormally increased at 3 months (8.24 mL/min/kg [5.38–10.54 mL/min/kg]) but significantly decreased at 6 months (p = 0.013). At 3 months, at the maximum workload (67% [55–89%] of predicted workload), oxygen uptake peaked at 81% (64–104%) of predicted maximum oxygen uptake, with oxygen pulse and heart rate reaching respectively 110% (76–140%) and 71% (64–81%) of predicted maximum values. Ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide remains within normal ranges. The 50% decrease in oxygen uptake after maximum effort was delayed, at 130 seconds (115–142 s). Recovery was incomplete with a persistent anaerobic metabolism. At 6 months, no significant improvement was observed, excepting an increase in heart rate reaching 79% (72–95%) (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS:
Prolonged reduced exercise capacity was observed up to 6 months in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 survivors. This disability did not result from residual pulmonary or cardiac dysfunction but rather from a metabolic disorder characterized by a sustained hypermetabolism and an impaired oxygen utilization.

Open access, https://journals.lww.com/ccejournal...ry_Exercise_Testing_in_Critically_Ill.24.aspx
 
Comparisons Between Patients Who Did or Did Not Completed Inpatients Rehabilitation After Hospital Discharge
At M3, muscle mass, resting RER, peak Vo2 and Veq Co2, percentage of maximal predicted workload, and timing for T1/2 were not statistically different between the two groups of patients.

Sounds like rehab is ineffective.

Patients used proteins as metabolic fuel, rather than lipids, as suggested by baseline elevated RER, both at M3 and M6.

Sounds similar to what was reported by Fluge and Mella (increased consumption of amino acids for energy productin in a pattern consistent with impaired pyruvate dehydrogenase).
 
Back
Top Bottom