Criticisms of DecodeME in the media - and responses to the criticisms

I never said ME is FND, its not as it doesn’t include motor or sensory features that would qualify. I have said that i think evidence points to it being a functional somatic syndrome


Odd assertion isn’t it?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3790.png
    IMG_3790.png
    551.8 KB · Views: 17
Isn't this criticism backwards? (Even if it were true, which if I have understood correctly it isn't.)

A high error rate in the diagnosis would lead to messy data which would weaken the patterns that the analysis uncovered.

But the analysis showed strong patterns.

If the data were messy but still showed strong patterns that would have meant that the patterns for a clean dataset would have been even stronger.

This criticism would have been relevant to make before the study, to warn the investigators about things they should improve to get a better result.
Seems like you’re trying to apply logic to nonsense!
 
A high error rate in the diagnosis would lead to messy data which would weaken the patterns that the analysis uncovered.

That is one argument - and valid.
But the other argument is also valid - that the 'ME/CFS/' cohort contained a significant number of people with some other problem with a genetic basis. The main argument against this is that the genes pulled out by DecodeME are not picked out in conditions likely to cause interference. The pain gene may be the same variant picked up in fibromyalgia but that would be a not unexpected overlap.
 
What about the heritabillity claim? "Heritability was 9.5% in the
@DecodeMEstudy . The heritability of depression is 40-50%, and 30-40% for anxiety disorders."
 
What about the heritabillity claim? "Heritability was 9.5% in the
@DecodeMEstudy . The heritability of depression is 40-50%, and 30-40% for anxiety disorders."
You find similarly high rates in ME if you look at twin heritability studies.

And similarly modest ones to decodeME if you look at GWAS heritability in depression and anxiety.

Fundamentally he’s weaponising two very different ways to measure heritability. It’s like comparing degrees celcius to degrees farenheit.
 
Carson, like others making similar comments, thinks he's pointing out something important, while actually showing his ignorance about ME/CFS. These things are typical of ME/CFS but not typical of depression:

Having to lie flat at least some of the time
Delayed worsening of symptoms in response to activities
Rest in a quiet, darkened room improves symptoms.
Can have significant functional impairment and symptoms without poor mood.
PEM episodes follow a different time pattern than depressive episodes.

This misconception is probably because doctors have been trained to look for certain symptoms typical of depression, but have not been trained to look for certain problems typical of ME. When one only looks at things like fatigue, sleep issues, cognitive impairment ME/CFS does resemble depression.
 
Last edited:
Yes. Find the MUPPETS presentation . Nicely nails it.
@Tilly
@Maat
one of mine
 
Carson in SMC.

Funny how he highlights depression when there were no hits on genes related to depression!
Some depressive co morbidity is to be expected in long term illness. Open question as to whether it worsens non depressive features. My bet is that any study of , say, MS. or sarcoid will cover numerous with depressive states.
Depressive co-morbids in the absence of genetic signatures for depression strengthens the argument against depression as initiating factor at least. The more the merrier. For a Prof of NPs I would think this would be an obvious immediate observation.
I think the question as to constitution of cohort is valid and I wonder whether I as a sarcoid sufferer with a fatigue state illness well established before sarcoid diagnosis have shown the ME signature or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom