Can folks point out any studies that demonstrate that "Long Covid" at six months with MECFS symptoms is a distinct disease/syndrome/entity from ME/CFS? I remember Nath commenting on this, but I don't remember where I saw this. I'm seeing way too many articles in the popular press that discuss Long Covid with MECFS-type symptoms, that either don't mention MECFS at all, or if they do, they use verbiage like "similar to" MECFS
Thanks.
I think "ME/CFS-type symptoms" is actually the appropriate form in the context of general articles about Long COVID.
Long COVID is an inexact short hand for a plethora of symptoms which include some that are of known pathophysiology, affecting a range of organs, some in ways that are identifiable, and the whole being expressed variably without a clear common pattern of disease across a large and so far poorly characterised population.
ME/CFS is a specific term for a condition identified by exclusion of known pathophysiology and which affects (in scientific literature at least) a reasonably well described patient population.
These are two very different concepts.
We currently have no idea whether there are distinct pathophysiologies to be found within the ME/CFS patient population although that seems entirely possible. If infection is an initiating factor – and to date we have only the untestable anecdote of patients that acute illness = ME/CFS onset – then COVID 19 initiated ME/CFS may be different from say EBV initiated ME/CFS but until we have evidence of causal and/or initiating pathology there is no way to make a distinction.
However the inability to make a pathophysiological distinction between possible causes/initiators of ME/CFS doesn’t mean that there’s a basis to conflate a putative cause/initiator – in this case COVID 19 infection - with ME/CFS.
It will be a clinical decision whether an individual is diagnosed with ME/CFS following COVID 19 infection. Under the current state of knowledge it is axiomatic that diagnosis can’t establish any pathological link with COVID 19 so the clinician, having excluded any testable pathology, and noting the presence of the qualifying symptomology should give a diagnosis of ME/CFS wholly independent of any previously noted COVID 19 infection. If the patient has symptoms other than those that are typical of ME/CFS then by the logic of an exclusionary diagnosis those symptoms should be explored before an ME/CFS diagnosis is given.
It’s conceivable that comorbid diagnoses could be given but again logically that should only happen where a comorbidity with ME/CFS is established by investigation and is subject to treatment additional to managing ME/CFS.