Andy
Senior Member (Voting rights)
Abstract
Fatigue is a severely disabling symptom that can substantially impair quality of life and employment prospects, and has serious socioeconomic consequences. Different individual and disease-related variables interact to generate this complex symptom, leading to clinical heterogeneity. We currently lack a common understanding and definition of fatigue and its origins, thereby impeding professional exchange among disciplines regarding diagnosis and underlying pathophysiology. To aid the development of a common language that encapsulates the heterogeneity of fatigue, we propose a taxonomy consisting of neurogenic, myogenic and systemic clusters. Each cluster comprises the same five distinct concepts and their phenotypic expression. The interplay between multifactorial pathophysiological mechanisms might vary between diseases and over time, and additional factors such as comorbidities can modulate fatigue. Understanding this complexity is essential to improve both the diagnostic process and the development of targeted therapeutic interventions.In this Review, we compare the clinical and pathophysiological characteristics of a range of neurological and non-neurological diseases within predefined clusters of fatigue origin. We propose an integrative model for fatigue of different origin and over time based on the interplay of genetics and epigenetics, immunological changes, structural and functional brain abnormalities, and behavioural alterations. Large research consortia will be required to tackle the methodological shortcomings that currently hamper our understanding of fatigue and to initiate large longitudinal cohort studies with multidimensional readouts to further explore and address this burdensome symptom.
Key points
- Fatigue is a major unmet medical need with serious socioeconomic implications.
- The use of a more precise taxonomy, including clusters of origin (neurogenic, myogenic and systemic) and different concepts of fatigue should foster a better understanding of the condition among researchers and clinicians and enable more precise therapeutic decisions to be made.
- Heterogeneity in pathological mechanisms and phenotypes, as well as a lack of methodological standardization, hinder progress in identifying biomarkers and therapeutic approaches for fatigue.
- Genetics and epigenetics, immunological changes, behavioural alterations, and structural and functional CNS abnormalities are the main pathogenetic drivers that govern fatigue phenotypes, and fatigue is modulated by comorbidities, personality, motivation and other factors.
- Management of fatigue requires a multidisciplinary, individualized and integrated approach.
- Larger consortia that can recruit large longitudinal cohorts and use multidimensional readouts would be best suited to tackle the conundrum of fatigue.