Functional cognitive disorder: dementia’s blind spot, 2020, Stone, Edwards et al

Andy

Retired committee member
More empire building by the FND crew.
An increasing proportion of cognitive difficulties are recognized to have a functional cause, the chief clinical indicator of which is internal inconsistency. When these symptoms are impairing or distressing, and not better explained by other disorders, this can be conceptualized as a cognitive variant of functional neurological disorder, termed functional cognitive disorder (FCD).

FCD is likely very common in clinical practice but may be under-diagnosed. Clinicians in many settings make liberal use of the descriptive term mild cognitive impairment (MCI) for those with cognitive difficulties not impairing enough to qualify as dementia. However, MCI is an aetiology-neutral description, which therefore includes patients with a wide range of underlying causes. Consequently, a proportion of MCI cases are due to non-neurodegenerative processes, including FCD. Indeed, significant numbers of patients diagnosed with MCI do not ‘convert’ to dementia.

The lack of diagnostic specificity for MCI ‘non-progressors’ is a weakness inherent in framing MCI primarily within a deterministic neurodegenerative pathway. It is recognized that depression, anxiety and behavioural changes can represent a prodrome to neurodegeneration; empirical data are required to explore whether the same might hold for subsets of individuals with FCD. Clinicians and researchers can improve study efficacy and patient outcomes by viewing MCI as a descriptive term with a wide differential diagnosis, including potentially reversible components such as FCD.

We present a preliminary definition of functional neurological disorder–cognitive subtype, explain its position in relation to other cognitive diagnoses and emerging biomarkers, highlight clinical features that can lead to positive diagnosis (as opposed to a diagnosis of exclusion), and red flags that should prompt consideration of alternative diagnoses. In the research setting, positive identifiers of FCD will enhance our recognition of individuals who are not in a neurodegenerative prodrome, while greater use of this diagnosis in clinical practice will facilitate personalised interventions.
Paywall, https://academic.oup.com/brain/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/brain/awaa224/5892366
Sci hub, https://sci-hub.tw/10.1093/brain/awaa224
 
My mother has major internal inconsistency in her cognitive impairment. She knows who I am but doesn't know who I am. She knows where she lives but still wants to 'go home'. She has no idea there is an epidemic but she knows that Oxford will soon have a vaccine. And so on.

She has advanced dementia, but of no known cause. (Alzheimer's has no known cause either.)
 
So now people with Mild Cognitive Impairment or early dementia are going to be told that with CBT they can learn to remember things again, they can get back their word-finding ability, and will get back their logic and reasoning ability?

And if it doesn't work the patient will be assumed to be what? Lazy? Could remember things if they just tried harder? Will remember their vocabulary again and will speak as fluently and logically as they did when they were twenty years younger?

This is absolute rubbish!!!
 
Complete gibberish.
Clinicians and researchers can improve study efficacy and patient outcomes by viewing MCI as a descriptive term with a wide differential diagnosis, including potentially reversible components such as FCD
Chemo fog is a well-known consequence of chemotherapy. This is what it describes. It is reversible once chemotherapy ends, at least for the most part. Being reversible or not has nothing to do with "conversion disorder". It even has a known cause. So is the mental confusion that is present with nearly all illness. This is all gibberish nonsense.
When these symptoms are impairing or distressing, and not better explained by other disorders, this can be conceptualized as a cognitive variant of functional neurological disorder, termed functional cognitive disorder
Anything can be conceptualized as anything. What kind of ridiculous nonsense is this? You can conceptualize cancer as an astrological phenomenon if you want, by that standard. How is this ridiculous juvenile nonsense worthy of publication? Or funding? Or being taken seriously?
Indeed, significant numbers of patients diagnosed with MCI do not ‘convert’ to dementia.
You can inject people with LPS (?) creating a sickness response and get MCI that does not "convert", whatever is meant here, to dementia. You can do the same by infecting people with the flu virus, as well as several other pathogens. So what? This isn't even clever or arguing anything, it's nothing but a nonsensical word salad by delusional people.
 
Back
Top Bottom