Graded exercise self-help for chronic fatigue syndrome in GETSET, Twisk, 2018

Indigophoton

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I don't think this has been posted yet - by @FrankTwisk,
The results of the guided graded exercise self-help trial (GETSET) by Lucy Clark and colleagues1 reaffirm that graded exercise therapy (GET) is not a rehabilitative treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome.2 Although fatigue (measured by Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire [CFQ]) and physical functioning (assessed using the Short Form-36 physical function [SF-36 PF] subscale) improved in the guided graded exercise self-help (GES) group (and the non-intervention group), these effects were by far insufficient to come close to the normal levels defined previously3 by one of the GETSET authors (CFQ ≤6 and SF-36 PF ≥85).
Finally, the conclusion that GET is a safe intervention is at odds with another GETSET publication,5which reported that a chronic fatigue syndrome patient subgroup deteriorated due to GET and observed that the “deteriorated group reported experiencing more barriers to GET, including a worse exacerbation of symptoms in response to GET”.5 Overall, the conclusion that GET is an effective and safe treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome is not substantiated by the outcomes.
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)30673-1/abstract
 
I'm absolutely speechless. How completely wrong I was.

Healthwise just contacted me. I'll make a separate post about this later.

Suffice it to say that after reviewing all my input, Healthwise has decided to remove all GET/CBT from their ME/CFS content this fall. Healthwise content is used by many major healthcare providers in the United States, including Kaiser Permanente.

A most sincere thank you, @FrankTwisk. You were the straw that broke Healthwise's back, so to speak.
 
Back
Top Bottom