Sasha
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I can't understand how this s**tshow continues.
Academia is supposed to be a place of the cut and thrust of ideas. Rubbish gets spouted, rubbish gets ripped apart, the field moves forward. That's what academic science is supposed to be.
So where are all the high-impact critique papers burning down the BPS studies? Is no one writing them? Or do the high-impact journals refuse to publish them?
Would any heavyweights here like to write such a critique? Or can we inspire such a critique to be written? Maybe by a team? To get into a high-impact journal or be delivered at a major conference (Cochrane!
)
Academia is supposed to be a place of the cut and thrust of ideas. Rubbish gets spouted, rubbish gets ripped apart, the field moves forward. That's what academic science is supposed to be.
So where are all the high-impact critique papers burning down the BPS studies? Is no one writing them? Or do the high-impact journals refuse to publish them?
Would any heavyweights here like to write such a critique? Or can we inspire such a critique to be written? Maybe by a team? To get into a high-impact journal or be delivered at a major conference (Cochrane!