Healthcare utilization patterns and medication burden in [LC]: a cross-sectional analysis reveals four phenotypes, 2026, Hamberger, Hinterberger et al

Chandelier

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Healthcare utilization patterns and medication burden in post-COVID syndrome: a cross-sectional analysis reveals four phenotypes

Hamberger, Jens; Kraus, Linda; Meissner, Karin; Hinterberger, Thilo; Loew, Thomas; Schoeffski, Oliver; Gündel, Harald; Walter, Steffen; Jarczok, Marc N.; Weimer, Katja

Abstract
Post-COVID syndrome has emerged as a major public health challenge, yet comprehensive characterization of healthcare utilization patterns and medication burden within single cohorts remains limited.

This cross-sectional analysis examined baseline data from 76 patients (49 ± 12 years, 62% female) enrolled in a randomized trial of psychosomatic treatment interventions for functional post-COVID syndrome.
Participants completed the Health Care Utilization Questionnaire (HCU) assessing physician visits, hospitalizations, alternative healing methods, and other healthcare services over the preceding 12 months.
Medication and other preparation (MOP) use was systematically documented and classified using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system.
K-means clustering identified distinct patient phenotypes, and correlations between MOP count and healthcare utilization were examined using Spearman correlation coefficients.

Healthcare utilization was universal, with 100% of participants engaging with healthcare services and a mean of 43.5 contacts per year.
Medication burden was substantial, with 85.5% taking at least one medication, a mean of 4.57 medications per patient, and polypharmacy (≥5 MOP, all types) present in 39.5% of the cohort (46.1% of patients with any MOP).
K-means clustering identified four distinct patient phenotypes:
Low Utilizers (64.5%, n = 49),
Moderate-High Utilizers (27.6%, n = 21),
High-Intensity Users (6.6%),
and one outlier.
High-Intensity Users demonstrated the most striking profile with 9.60 mean medications, 75.0 total healthcare contacts annually, and mean out-of-pocket costs of €2,881.
MOP count showed significant positive correlations with total doctor visits ( ρ = 0.471, p < 0.001), total healthcare contacts ( ρ = 0.344, p = 0.002), and out-of-pocket costs ( ρ = 0.375, p = 0.001).
Post-COVID syndrome patients demonstrate high healthcare engagement, substantial medication burden, and meaningful heterogeneity in utilization patterns.
The identification of distinct patient clusters and strong correlations between medication burden and healthcare utilization provide insights for developing targeted clinical management strategies.
This study is based on a selected clinical cohort, and findings should be interpreted with caution regarding generalizability to the broader post-COVID population.
These findings may inform clinical management strategies and health system planning for post-COVID patients.

Web | DOI | PMC | PDF | Frontiers in Health Services | Open Access
 
These findings may inform clinical management strategies and health system planning for post-COVID patients
Of all the weird things in the abstract, and there are many, this is by far the weirdest one. This discipline is so awful that it's hard to imagine a homeopathic clinic being any worse at any single part of... whatever it is they do. Shaking water, I guess. Hey on a related thought, does a toilet flushing count as homeopathic shaking? Whatevs.

I decided to read a bit because the medication/polypharmacy thing seems obviously inflated, and sure enough: they include supplements, many of the medication are antidepressants, which hardly anyone asks for, for acid reflux, or otherwise appropriate. The 3rd most common is a thyroid drug, and I'm not judging or an expert at it, but I assume that people taking thyroid medication probably should take them. A few supplements more, then a high blood pressure drug, probably also wise to take them. Oh, another cardiac drug, then another high blood pressure.

So they try to make "ermergud they're wildly over-medicated" when actually it's mostly supplements, ibuprofen, or common medication that they should probably be taking, and actually make a reference to a psychosomatic shop (can hardly call this a clinic) a bizarre choice. How does someone prescribe heart failure medication to someone and think it's a good idea to refer them to a psychosomatic shop?!

There are zero details or data about what "health contacts" mean, and it's frankly not believable, I don't think I had 43 health contacts (the mean) in total in 18 years of illness, but it depends entirely on what is even meant by that, and they don't bother defining it. I guess they must include calls for appointments, going to the pharmacy, and count hospitalization days individually.

Something funny about this wildly inflated number is that it points to massive dysfunction in the health care system, but as is tradition the responsibility for systemic failure falls on those who are fail. All of this points to a complete lack of coherent anything, zero accountability and a system that has zero ability to take responsibility for anything. It's like a system built to maximize cost and minimize efficiency, and sure enough, it definitely achieves that.

Honestly this is reaching antivaxxers level of propaganda. It's so easy to see why things are FUBAR here, medicine's complete mishandling of chronic illness is the most extreme incompetence I have ever seen in my life.
 
How does someone prescribe heart failure medication to someone and think it's a good idea to refer them to a psychosomatic shop?!
From ResearchGate:

Volker Köllner​

Research in Therapy and Rehabilitation of Post COVID Condition and Psychocardiology​

These German psychosomaticians are not to be underestimated.
Let’s have a look at Professor Thilo Hinterberger’s website.

Machine Translation:


Expanding Horizons and Connecting Science, Culture, Medicine, Therapy, Philosophy, and Spirituality​

Welcome to the Network of Consciousness Sciences​
​

Contact​

Prof. Dr. Thilo Hinterberger​
Research Division of Applied Consciousness Sciences​
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine​
University Hospital Regensburg​
Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11​
93053 Regensburg, Germany​
​
IMGP8480-1024x680.webp​
Prof. Dr. Thilo Hinterberger​

About Me​

Short Biography​

Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Thilo Hinterberger holds a degree in physics and is a neuroscientist and consciousness researcher. His research spans a broad range of fields, from brain-computer interfaces and the investigation of altered states of consciousness to the evaluation of therapeutic approaches, as well as various topics in medicine and society. Fostering dialogue and exchange between science and society is of particular importance to Prof. Hinterberger.​
​
Since 2011, he has headed the Research Division of Applied Consciousness Sciences within the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine at University Hospital Regensburg. Prof. Hinterberger is President of the Society for Consciousness Sciences and Consciousness Culture (GBB e.V.), Vice Chair of the Consciousness Sciences Foundation, and a member of the Future Council of the University of Regensburg. He serves on the editorial board of the journal Bewusstseinswissenschaften – Transpersonale Psychologie und Psychotherapie, is an Associate Editor of the APA journal Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, and serves on the editorial advisory boards of the journals Evolve and Spiritual Care.​


 
Why psychosomatic medicine is so big in Germany. Via pubmed:

 
Back
Top Bottom