Increased anti-nucleocapsid secretory IgA and consumption of complement component 3 in post-COVID syndrome patients, 2026, Hai et al.

SNT Gatchaman

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Staff member
Increased anti-nucleocapsid secretory IgA and consumption of complement component 3 in post-COVID syndrome patients
Hai, Zhiwen; Yang, Weihua; Ghazi, Azam; Buitrago, Amalia; Marín-García, Patricia; Azcárate, Isabel G; González-Escalada, Alba; Rossi, Nineth; Benítez-Cruz, Javier; Estévez-Benito, Iván; Tortajada, Agustín; Regueiro, José R; Bautista, José M; Martinez-Quiles, Narcisa

INTRODUCTION
Post-COVID syndrome represents a major global health challenge which is characterized by immune dysregulation, although many aspects of the immune response remain incompletely understood, particularly the antibody response and the role of the complement system. We previously studied a post-COVID syndrome cohort in comparison to a COVID-recovered control cohort from Comunidad de Madrid (Spain) and found that post-COVID syndrome patients exhibited readily detectable serum anti-Nucleocapsid antibodies while showing deficient antibody production against the full-length Spike, despite maintaining a well-preserved anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) response.

METHODS
In the present study, we quantified anti-Nucleocapsid secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) in saliva and analyzed selected key components of the complement system, including C3, C4, factor B (FB), factor H (FH), and total hemolytic activity (CH50). Additionally, we quantified circulating immune complexes. We conducted general, stratified, correlation, and regression analyses.

RESULTS
Anti-Nucleocapsid sIgA was increased in post-COVID syndrome samples compared with COVID-recovered controls. Although CH50 levels were similar, we detected a reduced concentration of C3. The levels of C4 were decreased but not significantly. Interestingly, in recently reinfected fully vaccinated patients, serum anti-Nucleocapsid IgG showed a negative correlation with FH and CH50. No differences were found for the concentration of circulating immune complexes. Regression analysis indicated that C3 levels can discriminate patients from controls efficiently, and combining anti- Nucleocapsid sIgA and C3 levels yielded improved discriminatory power.

DISCUSSION
The elevated anti-Nucleocapsid sIgA levels found did not correlate with increased anti-Nucleocapsid IgG in serum, as expected from their different temporal dynamics. The reduced C3 levels may reflect ongoing complement activation and subsequent consumption, which might be potentiated by increments in serum of anti-Nucleocapsid antibodies produced after reinfections. In conclusion, our findings suggest that salivary anti-Nucleocapsid IgA and C3 consumption, which seems to be more subtle parameter than CH50, may serve as candidate biomarkers of post-COVID syndrome, requiring validation in independent cohorts. Furthermore, these results implicate the complement system as a key dysregulated component of the immune response contributing to the pathophysiology of post-COVID syndrome, thus potentially amenable to targeted therapies.

Web | DOI | PDF | Frontiers in Immunology | Open Access
 
All of the plots seem to be overlapping.

They claim that combining sIgA and C3 enables them to discriminate between controls and LC. A PCA plot might have been warranted?

The negative finding related to immune complexes might be useful:
Considering that the antibody response is altered in patients with post-COVID syndrome (13), together with reported antigen persistence (25), we hypothesized that circulating immune complexes may contribute to disease pathology. To address this, we quantified circulating immune complexes in our cohorts and found no differences (Supplementary Figure 3). Precisely, we detected only one positive individual in the COVID-recovered cohort and three in the PCS cohort, indicating that IC formation does not seem to be a general relevant pathogenic mechanism in PCS.
 
The negative finding related to immune complexes might be useful:

I don't think we have any clinical evidence for immune complex-mediated events in Long Covid. Large immune complexes produce nephritis - which is not a feature. Small immune complexes produce synovitis/arthritis, which is not a feature.

Nevertheless, I think using a C1q binding assay is misguided - harking back to the 1980s when we failed to realise that immune complexes cause harm, not because they fix complement (in which case they are clearly instantly by red cells), but if they fail to fix complement (which in different ways is the problem both in lupus and RA). C1q binding does give a positive result in lupus patients but the relation to pathology is complicated and paradoxical.
 
Back
Top Bottom