Well, I was thinking cells throughout the brain could have high lactate. Not localized necessarily. Maybe all neurons or all of a certain glial cell.But anterior cingulate isn't all round the ventricles - i.e. it doesn't really add up.
Well, I was thinking cells throughout the brain could have high lactate. Not localized necessarily. Maybe all neurons or all of a certain glial cell.But anterior cingulate isn't all round the ventricles - i.e. it doesn't really add up.
Well, I was thinking cells throughout the brain could have high lactate.

Ah interesting, that is really handy to have.One study tested lactate using both methods, but it was only high when using MRS, as mentioned below.
Am I understanding you correctly: the suggestion is maybe the brain is both making more lactate and also using all that lactate before the CSF reaches the spinal tap?it is conceivable that lactate reflects not metaboolic changes but CSF flux/stasis changes. The CSF is made in the ventricles and ends up in the spinal tap. Ventricular CSF might have more lactate if brain uses it up as a substrate, or less, if brain produces it and it leaks out at the perimeter.
(I guess we still need to figure out if that would explain the ventricles having more lactate too.)Although glucose is usually assumed to be the main energy source for living tissues, there is evidence that lactate, in preference to glucose, is preferentially metabolized by neurons in the brains of several mammalian species that include mice, rats, and humans. According to the lactate-shuttle hypothesis, glial cells are responsible for transforming glucose into lactate, and for providing lactate to the neurons. Because of this local metabolic activity of glial cells, the extracellular fluid immediately surrounding neurons strongly differs in composition from the blood or cerebrospinal fluid, being much richer with lactate, as was found in microdialysis studies.
Yes, and if it holds up that lactate is disappearing (i.e. being used up?), leaving levels normal in CSF, then maybe that's a point in favour of it being something the neurons are successfully using, rather than the side effect of a lack of oxygen?It all seems rather complicated and I have a nasty suspicion that people doing studies on lactate, wherever, in ME/CFS work on the simplistic assumption:
lactate = bad = metabolic failure = ME/CFS = bingo.
Yea I'm curious too why the brain would prefer lactate. Biology folks correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the deal with lactate is that it is a useful fuel when you have oxygen, and a 'waste product' when you don't? (Probably waste product is unfair, but what I mean is: the no-oxygen ways of getting energy *produce* lactate rather than use it, I think?)Could the brain prefer lactate as fuel, when oxygen is low?