Long-term outcomes following hospital admission for COVID-19 versus seasonal influenza: a cohort study, 2023, Xie, Al-Aly et al.

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by SNT Gatchaman, Dec 14, 2023.

  1. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,822
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Long-term outcomes following hospital admission for COVID-19 versus seasonal influenza: a cohort study
    Yan Xie; Taeyoung Choi; Ziyad Al-Aly

    Background
    Previous comparative analyses of people admitted to hospital for COVID-19 versus influenza evaluated the risk of death, hospital readmission, and a narrow set of health outcomes up to 6 months following infection. We aimed to do a comparative evaluation of both acute and long-term risks and burdens of a comprehensive set of health outcomes following hospital admission for COVID-19 or seasonal influenza.

    Methods
    For this cohort study we used the health-care databases of the US Department of Veterans Affairs to analyse data from 81 280 participants admitted to hospital for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022, and 10 985 participants admitted to hospital for seasonal influenza between Oct 1, 2015, and Feb 28, 2019. Participants were followed up for up to 18 months to comparatively evaluate risks and burdens of death, a prespecified set of 94 individual health outcomes, ten organ systems, overall burden across all organ systems, readmission, and admission to intensive care. Inverse probability weighting was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Cox and Poisson models were used to generate estimates of risk on both the relative scale and absolute scale as the event rate and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) per 100 persons.

    Findings
    Over 18 months of follow-up, compared to seasonal influenza, the COVID-19 group had an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1·51 [95% CI 1·45–1·58]), corresponding to an excess death rate of 8·62 (95% CI 7·55–9·44) per 100 persons in the COVID-19 group versus the influenza group. Comparative analyses of 94 prespecified health outcomes showed that COVID-19 had an increased risk of 68·1% (64 of 94) pre-specified health outcomes; seasonal influenza was associated with an increased risk of 6·4% (six of 94) pre-specified health outcomes, including three out of four pre-specified pulmonary outcomes. Analyses of organ systems showed that COVID-19 had a higher risk across all organ systems except for the pulmonary system, the risk of which was higher in seasonal influenza. The cumulative rates of adverse health outcomes across all organ systems were 615·18 (95% CI 605·17–624·88) per 100 persons in COVID-19 and 536·90 (527·38–544·90) per 100 persons in seasonal influenza, corresponding to an excess rate of 78·72 (95% CI 66·15–91·24) per 100 persons in COVID-19. The total number of DALYs across all organ systems were 287·43 (95% CI 281·10–293·59) per 100 persons in the COVID-19 group and 242·66 (236·75, 247·67) per 100 persons in the seasonal influenza group, corresponding to 45·03 (95% CI 37·15–52·90) higher DALYs per 100 persons in COVID-19. Decomposition analyses showed that in both COVID-19 and seasonal influenza, there was a higher burden of health loss in the post-acute than the acute phase; and comparatively, except for the pulmonary system, COVID-19 had a higher burden of health loss across all other organ systems than seasonal influenza in both the acute and post-acute phase. Compared to seasonal influenza, COVID-19 also had an increased risk of hospital readmission (excess rate 20·50 [95% CI 16·10–24·86] per 100 persons) and admission to intensive care (excess rate 9·23 [6·68–11·82] per 100 persons). The findings were consistent in analyses comparatively evaluating risks in seasonal influenza versus COVID-19 by individuals' respective vaccination status and in those admitted to hospital during the pre-delta, delta, and omicron eras.

    Interpretation
    Although rates of death and adverse health outcomes following hospital admission for either seasonal influenza or COVID-19 are high, this comparative analysis shows that hospital admission for COVID-19 was associated with higher long-term risks of death and adverse health outcomes in nearly every organ system (except for the pulmonary system) and significant cumulative excess DALYs than hospital admission for seasonal influenza. The substantial cumulative burden of health loss in both groups calls for greater prevention of hospital admission for these two viruses and for greater attention to the care needs of people with long-term health effects due to either seasonal influenza or SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    Funding
    US Department of Veterans Affairs.


    Link | PDF (The Lancet Infectious Diseases)
     
    ahimsa, oldtimer, Mij and 1 other person like this.
  2. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    22,277
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    ‘Long flu’: study finds flu patients at higher risk of longer-term illness

    "People who have been hospitalised with flu are at an increased risk of longer-term health problems, similar to those with long Covid, data suggests.

    While the symptoms associated with such “long flu” appear to be more focused on the lungs than ongoing Covid symptoms, in both cases the risk of death and disability was greater in the months after infection than in the first 30 days.

    “It is very clear that long flu is worse than the flu, and long Covid is worse than Covid,” said Dr Ziyad Al-Aly, a clinical epidemiologist at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, who led the research.

    He was motivated to study the phenomenon after observing the scale of long-term illness experienced by people who have recovered from Covid."

    https://www.theguardian.com/society...atients-at-higher-risk-of-longer-term-illness
     
    ahimsa, EzzieD, alktipping and 4 others like this.
  3. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,889
    Location:
    Canada
    That the post-acute phase has been entirely ignored, denied to exist for the most part or minimized into irrelevance, may play a significant role in the higher burden. Ignoring problems does not make them cause no harm. If anything, the opposite is true.
     
    EzzieD, Sean and alktipping like this.
  4. LarsSG

    LarsSG Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    370
    It's been interesting to see Al-Aly and crew start out with flu as a control versus Covid in their earlier papers and then come to realize that actually flu is quite bad too and has post-acute consequences. Hopefully he manages to bring others along to this understanding.
     
    EzzieD, Chezboo, NelliePledge and 4 others like this.
  5. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,730
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    Maybe there’s a good scientific reason for not looking into what the long term consequences from viruses generally can be before carrying out such research? And particularly if you’re looking at a specific type of virus, looking into its history eg the Flu pandemic. As a non scientist it is counterintuitive to me.
     
    Trish and Midnattsol like this.
  6. Midnattsol

    Midnattsol Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,659
    This study has been presented as "Long covid similar to 'long cold'" in Norway. :banghead:
     
    Trish likes this.
  7. EndME

    EndME Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,004
    I don't think anybody should be suprised that any health disruption happening to 70 year old males with several comorbidities can bare health consequences. I strongly doubt you'll find any useful answers there though or that it's even anything worth studying in the fashion it's done here...
     
    Sean likes this.

Share This Page