I was under the impression that circulating cytokines trigger glial cells, which in turn cause "flu-like symptoms".Cytokines mostly act locally but there must be systemic signals for fever and malaise.
I was under the impression that circulating cytokines trigger glial cells, which in turn cause "flu-like symptoms".Cytokines mostly act locally but there must be systemic signals for fever and malaise.
I was under the impression that circulating cytokines trigger glial cells, which in turn cause "flu-like symptoms".
Thanks for the further info. I am happy to say that the signal is more likely some oligomer attached to nerves, though like @chillier, I just don't see what the story would be with that signal increasing at 24 hours post-exercise. Hence why I was interested in mtDNA, as that would be much more in line with other pieces of the puzzle, assuming that mtDNA fragments would stick around long enough to be detected at that timepoint (which they may not be).You have to remember that single dots on fluorescence nearly always include a proportion of artifactual signals (binding to dust or aggregates in the reagent). In the two pictures I have on file I don't see any significant signal in muscle cells. In the image without a vessel there are no dots within muscle cells. All the signals are between muscle cells. They are mostly dots but about 10% are short linear segments. That indicates they are almost certainly all sections of linear structures (taking into account the likely section thickness to be ~3micron). In the other picture there are about three dots the look to be inside muscle cells but (a) they look to me a slightly different hue, suggesting maybe artefact and (b) muscle cells can have peripheral invaginations that may not be apparent in terms of the background staining that shows us 'edge' here.
To me the muscle cells are pristine clean of stain.
With my new found knowledge of what a glial cell is (okay only roughly, at least I know different types exist) I have a question…I was under the impression that circulating cytokines trigger glial cells, which in turn cause "flu-like symptoms".
At first I thought it would be microglia, just because my symptoms got worse with tryptophan, and IIRC, microglia process that while astrocytes don't. That was ~20 years ago, while I was just beginning to learn about brain cells. Astrocytes have some properties that would fit as well. There are other types of glia that I haven't looked much into, and there are also very specialized ones that only reside in specific parts of the brain, which could be involved in ME but which probably haven't been studied in an ME context. I don't have enough base knowledge to make a comprehensive theory for glia in ME. To me, it just fits well, with glia responding to immune signals, responding quickly, and having the potential to explain most ME symptoms (some symptoms could be far downstream of the initial effects).Which type of glial cell are you thinking of here or more generally with the glial activation idea?
Could those specialized cells not then signal other glia? A specialized mediator doesn't mean that it can't trigger a wide range of flu-like symptoms. Has anyone figured out how a viral infection does cause that constellation of symptoms?I have not looked at the latest information on this but the picture I have had is that yes circulating cytokines signal directly to CNS cell but those are probably very specialised cells I hypothalamus,
Could those specialized cells not then signal other glia?
I personally do not see glial activation as likely to explain anything much in any of these diseases - it is usually just a sign of attempts to repair damage neural tissue. In the absence of damage and of any good evidence for glial activation I doubt it is going to contribute to the ME/CFS story
This from another thread but… I was listening to descriptions of neurotransmitters and receptors and this was saidetc. So inhibitory and excitatory can often go hand in hand.
Neurons are often referred to as excitatory or inhibitory, but more accurately it's the synapse that's excitatory or inhibitory, and even more specifically, it's the combination of the neurotransmitter that's released at the synapse and the receptor that it binds to on the post synaptic membrane. Because many neurotransmitters can bind to multiple types of receptors so that the neurotransmitter can sometimes be excitatory and it can sometimes be inhibitory to the target cell.
I’ve wondered that. There seems to be at least a genetic predisposition. Could there be a natural development towards it to? Perhaps with people pushed over an edge by an illness if not that illness being a trigger as has often been seen? I suppose some comes down to how you define these things and lots of conditions are ‘a bit of both’. And if we add on that there may be different types of ME/CFS.Does ME need to be an acquired condition?
"Glial activation" is probably too vague as a concept, but glia play critical roles in neurovascular coupling and sensing metabolic state:
Does ME need to be an acquired condition?
I personally do not see glial activation as likely to explain anything much in any of these diseases
Are Jarred Younger (eg his YouTube #15, #14) thoughts about microglia unlikely?
I am not sure what Younger's thoughts are specifically but that is my general position. T cells don't go into brains as a rule so I doubt that the 'synaptic' side of ME/CFS is to do with immune cells doing things in brain per se.
If we're thinking thinking peripheral synapses then the only choice is para/sympathetic ganglia right? Synaptic proteins like those found in zhang: homer, dlgap, syngap aren't expressed in NMJs or sensory nerve endings are they?
If we're thinking thinking peripheral synapses then the only choice is para/sympathetic ganglia right? Synaptic proteins like those found in zhang: homer, dlgap, syngap aren't expressed in NMJs or sensory nerve endings are they?
What compartments can you definitively rule out? Blood... others?
Though i suppose it could be synapses behaving poorly in the brain that directly affects the events at peripheral neuron tissue junctions which is where the substance of the pathology is happening.