Such was the stushie raised by the PACE trial — and I’m embarrassed to admit my ignorance of it until recently — that six years after its publication, a whole Special Issue: The PACE Trial was published on 9 August in the Journal of Health Psychology (2017, 22, No 9). In one paper, Keith Geraghty refers to the fact that in September 2016, a tribunal ordered the PACE trial’s lead author’s institution to release data following a Freedom of Information case brought by a patient with CFS. The released data, according to Geraghty, “showed that the effectiveness of CBT and GET, in comparison to SMC and adaptive pacing therapy (APT), fell by almost two-thirds”. This released, writes Geraghty, “a perfect storm of patient anger and professional defensiveness”.