I know, why not something unpopular that no one would missNot ice cream!![]()
Yes! Grits!I know, why not something unpopular that no one would miss
I think it should be illegal to call anything without eggs 'ice cream'. And of course cream. Low fat ice cream should not even be a thing.And of course real icecream has no need for trehalose - it's just cream, egg yolk, sugar and fruit (or other flavouring).
Low fat ice cream should not even be a thing
Low fat anything is junk, it has to be loaded up with additives to make it palatable.
Does non low fat yogurt in fact contain significant amounts of fat? i.e. much above the 4% which is normally in the milk it's made from?Low fat yoghurt. Yuck.![]()
Does non low fat yogurt in fact contain significant amounts of fat? i.e. much above the 4% which is normally in the milk it's made from?
I have to wonder why they bothered, unless it's simply an excuse to get more refined sugars into our diets without many people noticing.
Wonko said:Does non low fat yogurt in fact contain significant amounts of fat?
It's used in product marketing to simply mean less fat than the normal version of the product.....and, doesn't "low" in this nutritional context typically mean, less than 5%![]()
A claim that a food is low in fat, and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer, may only be made where the product contains no more than 3 g of fat per 100 g for solids or 1,5 g of fat per 100 ml for liquids (1,8 g of fat per 100 ml for semi-skimmed milk).
https://www.nature.com/news/archaeology-the-milk-revolution-1.13471During the most recent ice age, milk was essentially a toxin to adults because — unlike children — they could not produce the lactase enzyme required to break down lactose, the main sugar in milk. But as farming started to replace hunting and gathering in the Middle East around 11,000 years ago, cattle herders learned how to reduce lactose in dairy products to tolerable levels by fermenting milk to make cheese or yogurt. Several thousand years later, a genetic mutation spread through Europe that gave people the ability to produce lactase — and drink milk — throughout their lives. That adaptation opened up a rich new source of nutrition that could have sustained communities when harvests failed.
Personally I'm in favour of natural fats in meat and dairy (in moderation, evidently)
Most "unfarmed" animal meat has a lower fat content than "farmed" meat - at least in the cases of ostrich, bison, erm...struggling to think of another animal here. It's apparently a thing for US farmers to deliberately "bulk" up their cattle for a few weeks before sale/slaughtering, rapid weight gain in the absence of exercise tends to go on as fat.
So I'm not convinced.![]()
This confused me as to your posts intent, based on your reply, to my reply, it appears you were mainly talking about modern farmed animals, and not the animals we ate, a "while" ago.Animals that humans ate as they were evolving were far fattier than modern animals.
This confused me as to your posts intent, based on your reply, to my reply, it appears you were mainly talking about modern farmed animals, and not the animals we ate, a "while" ago.
![]()
They don't seem to require any excuse to add more refined sugar. I read that people who are trying to lose weight could use vanilla as a flavoring because it adds sweetness without calories. Yet vanilla yogurt has the same amount of sugar (too much) as lemon.I have to wonder why they bothered, unless it's simply an excuse to get more refined sugars into our diets without many people noticing.
"Unfarmed" (and grass-fed) animals have mostly omega-3 fatty acids in their fat. Grain-fed animals have more onega-6 fatty acids from the grain.Most "unfarmed" animal meat has a lower fat content than "farmed" meat