New Zealand: Dr Kannaiyan Rabindranath - Hamilton nephrologist

According to ORCID his only activity is as a peer reviewer on The effects of cognitive behavioural therapy on depression and quality of life in patients with maintenance haemodialysis: a systematic review (2020, BMC Psychiatry)

Peer review records are here. His review is —

 

In another forum where I asked about him, I got a response that he apparently follows the current NICE guidelines & is known to ANZMES. As yet no feedback from patients with direct experience has come to my attention.

 

I first heard of him about 3 years ago, I think I read something online at the time, that he has a close relative ?wife with ME/CFS - could be wrong, can't find the reference at the moment. It would be great if he could join this forum and tell us himself.

It was about the time Dr Vallings retired and started mentoring Dr. Judikje Scheffer, a GP who had been working for Cycling NZ in Cambridge but had started up Jusc Medical specialising in CFS/ME. I think Dr Vallings was also mentoring him.

I presume if he is in private practice in Hamilton and Tauranga, as per his Healthpoint Page, there would be an opportunity for people outside Waikato/Bay of Plenty to be able to arrange a consultation with him.

@SNT Gatchaman I think it is difficult to characterise a clinician's "BPS status" on the basis of what you have presented.

I searched through another forum I am on and a patient that had seen him said he diagnosed her with ME following covid infection, he was caring, considerate, knowledgeable about ME, very thorough and explained tests required to rule out other conditions. She was recommending him to the group. Have not found any mention of him being BPS.

 

It was a bit late last night, but despite the ORCID record paucity, looking at the Cochrane review, I see he was the first author on the 2005 review (and its 2003 protocol) and a senior author on the 2019 revision.

The 2005 review stated —

The 2019 review opened with —

and concluded —

So I think we can at least say he has an established interest in psychosocial interventions as possible treatments in the chronic dialysis context.

 

I don't agree, I have no problem with his paper. He appears to be looking at the level of evidence for various interventions. I have not read the full paper but for a nephrologist to be concerned about the mental health of his dialysis patients, I think is a good thing. I am retired psychiatrist with ME who treated clients with ME with co-morbid mental health conditions, so does that make me BPS? I know many clinicians within my local mental health practitioner community (psychiatrists, psychologists, occupational therapists) who see ME as a biological illness (some are part of active ME advocacy) who are not BPS. I do not think it is within our capacity to remove "psychosocial" from psychiatry/psychology.

@Hutan, yes, Dr Vallings definitely had a lot of ideas I didn't agree with, I don't agree with everything ANZMES does either, but I would like to keep an open mind on Dr Rabindranath, having consultant physicians with a special interest in ME/CFS are rare, in my experience. The one we had locally for 30 years has now retired. Consultants often have mentors and supervisors, doesn't mean they agree with everything that they say.

 

@Hutan
https://www.ccdhb.org.nz/about-us/h...-clinical-support-services/icu/roberts-peter/

I was diagnosed by him in 1996 and never needed to see him again. I heard several doctors talk of his special interest in this field but I don't think he had any research outputs. GP's would refer to him to get a diagnosis of post infectious syndromes including ME.

I can't speak to his BPS beliefs. I had a very thorough examination and he commented "well you don't look depressed" which could be BPS if you want to interpret it that way, but having been a clinician it is important to make sure the client does not also have moderate to severe clinical depression which might require mental health treatment and support.

Often physicians would refer to psychiatry when they were concerned about major mental health disorders but that has changed due to high demand for mental health services, whereby the specialist physician would note any concerns in the consult letter to the GP and the GP would then discuss this concern with their patient and then decide if a referral should be made to specialist mental health services, with their patient's consent. Often mild (and some moderate ) mental health problems, where the patient did not have significant risks of harm to self or others are treated within primary care.

I know people were being referred to CL psychiatry in the next few years during my training but not all people diagnosed with ME were referred there. That department definitely was BPS. Though there have been changes in psychiatry since then, there are still local psychiatrists who think LC and ME are psychosomatic.

I didn't even know CCDHB had a Post-infectious Clinic until a few years ago when I was referred to it but the lead consultant retired and it closed permanently and I never got seen. It was at the same time, Dr Roberts retired so I guessed he was still running it or perhaps being such a senior doctor at the hospital - supervising the physicians that were now running it. Could be wrong. I have been retired for 11 years.

 

Definitely.

We've posted at least one paper relating to fatigue in patients on long-term dialysis. Chronic pain is also a common issue. We also know there are significant cardiovascular risks, with increased mortality. I think it's long been generally held that dialysis is associated with increased prevalence of depression. As a junior, working briefly in an HD unit, I recall this was said to be due to (paraphrasing from distant memory) "being chained to a machine for three afternoons a week, unable to do anything else". I don't know if that's still thought to be the explanation. If so, I would suggest that pwS/VSME might welcome such an intermittent scenario and yet I don't think they are found to have unduly high rates of depression, so I'm not sure that could be a good explanation.

However, maybe that constant taste of freedom/rescinded, is even more psychologically damaging. From someone with much more experience —

However, as Dr Rabindranath said in the original 2005 review —

It's a trope that seniors will tell their trainees: "the kidney knows more physiology than you ever will" (probably said by House, certainly said to me IRL!). Perhaps the profound metabolic, biochemical and immune dysregulation associated with the failed kidney has more yet to teach us.

From Asymmetric ADMA and Symmetric SDMA Dimethylarginines in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Clinical Approach (2019, International Journal of Molecular Sciences) —

From Urine Metabolomics Exposes Anomalous Recovery after Maximal Exertion in Female ME/CFS Patients (2023, International Journal of Molecular Sciences) —

And from Chronic Viral Reactivation and Associated Host Immune Response and Clinical Outcomes in Acute COVID-19 and Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (2024, Preprint: BioRxiv) —

 

@SNT Gatchaman. I also worked in nephrology as a "junior" on the nephrology ward and the renal transplant unit in Auckland and saw many dialysis clients coming in. Maybe we had different consultants but I didn't see a lot of BPS. I think it is worth noting we were both "juniors' about 30+ years ago? I am quite aware of end stage renal failure - dialysis patient's suffering. It is not easy.

Clinical Depression is common in all chronic illnesses, many chronic illnesses have a degree of pain or people have comorbid pain conditions and this group does have (to be even more specific - men) have a higher risk of suicide in this patient population.

My point is for a consultant to recognise that a person may be depressed is a good thing as it gives them an opportunity to check what their patient's supports and home environment is like, has there been a change in them?, do they need to arrange more support from family, carers, nursing staff, do they need better housing/transport /funding etc it has nothing to do with BPS, i.e getting them to exercise, meditate and do more "wellbeing" activities. Most consultants, I know, do accept they are unable to change the miserableness of their patient's condition and can only acknowledge and validate their patient' s lived experience.

 

What specifically??

 

Thanks! I don't remember but that's not unusual. I'll look and also check out the thread.

 

Ah, I see. "Excitable" is somewhat parallel to "likely to become hysterical" or "neurotic and over-sensitive," isn't it?

 

I would call Blanche du Bois in Streetcar "excitable."

 

So is this excitable "pathology" the same as, or similar to lability, that symptom long said to be to be common or characteristic in M.E, though it seems to have been dropped from the array some time ago

I was first given to understand its an emotional reactivity, not quite emoting, and found in alcoholism, so may be its maudlin I was never sure what was being observed and labelled emotionally labile

Its such a shame that the distinct disturbance of neuro-transmitters was not tracked for our benefit all these years, while people who are not biologically competent preferred to latch on and be shoddy

A kidney specialist could help a lot since the kidney and some hormones are regulating the electrifying metal salts on which the neurons operate, and the RAAS system is so inexplicaby anomalous in ME / CFS according to some article I read and now can't find

I read it in Breakthorugh, the magazine produced by ME Research UK who might fund Dr Rabindranath to run some preliminary analysis of any casework in his clinic relating to ME / CFS :

Tracking changes
in the structure
and function
of the brain
over time
in ME/CFS

Current projects: Project grants

I understand some people, whether or not academically trained, like to make out others are aberrant and this adds an encyclopaedia to the actal aberrations, as people are so very diverse

Its one thing to work at the cliff-face helping people who are too disrupted and disorderly to engage themselves with their own world, its another to see it everywhere. I would hate to be in a personal relationship with such a pontificator.

Surely Dr Rabindranath has been exposed to the best and worst of the UK health services and should be able to see it coming when on common ground with the ME /CFS community in NZ encountering the local tug of war over narratives and all that follows

As he moved to NZ for the benefit of his family, he might well like to endow his client community also with his perspicacious presence and so slowly over the years to come he might be establishing a new network of doctors in associated fields with interest in learning evermore how to differentiate between the categories and between the conventions