Lou B Lou
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Thread:
Thread:
"Here is some context for this action because I don't think people are angry enough. This is not limited to France. It's just that the meeting [conference] was held in France and the French patients were awesome enough to do this. The project itself is (was) an EU project under
the Horizon Europe program. That means, every EU country and some affiliated countries contributed (indirectly) money to this. In the project, there were 14 research groups from 6 countries involved. And the worst is, on the surface, the project looks legit
They talk about biomarkers and pathogenic mechanisms but it became clear early on that the project leaders are part of the BPS crowd and this is what dominated the project. You can read up everything about the project on http://longcovidproject.eu
Now what really gets me. Horizon Europe grants are notoriously difficult to get (less than 10% chance of being funded). So, someone (or rather many scientists all over the world as there are a lot of peers assessing each proposal) thought this project worthy of funding.
Think about that! And now think about the fact that, in the 2026, there was a call for research into post-infectious diseases. Which included (among other points) the following: "Proposals should address most of the following research areas: ......
"Identify effective supportive rehabilitation approaches, including physical therapy, cognitive interventions, and psychological support, to enhance patient recovery, mental health and quality of life and evaluate their effectiveness."
It's a small step from this to full psychologisation. BPS is basically built into the call and if one doesn't address one of points of the call, it's basically an automatic rejection.
This is so much bigger than just France. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/HORIZON-HLTH-2026-01-DISEASE-03
End Thread.
.
Thread:
"Here is some context for this action because I don't think people are angry enough. This is not limited to France. It's just that the meeting [conference] was held in France and the French patients were awesome enough to do this. The project itself is (was) an EU project under
the Horizon Europe program. That means, every EU country and some affiliated countries contributed (indirectly) money to this. In the project, there were 14 research groups from 6 countries involved. And the worst is, on the surface, the project looks legit
They talk about biomarkers and pathogenic mechanisms but it became clear early on that the project leaders are part of the BPS crowd and this is what dominated the project. You can read up everything about the project on http://longcovidproject.eu
Now what really gets me. Horizon Europe grants are notoriously difficult to get (less than 10% chance of being funded). So, someone (or rather many scientists all over the world as there are a lot of peers assessing each proposal) thought this project worthy of funding.
Think about that! And now think about the fact that, in the 2026, there was a call for research into post-infectious diseases. Which included (among other points) the following: "Proposals should address most of the following research areas: ......
"Identify effective supportive rehabilitation approaches, including physical therapy, cognitive interventions, and psychological support, to enhance patient recovery, mental health and quality of life and evaluate their effectiveness."
It's a small step from this to full psychologisation. BPS is basically built into the call and if one doesn't address one of points of the call, it's basically an automatic rejection.
This is so much bigger than just France. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/HORIZON-HLTH-2026-01-DISEASE-03
End Thread.
.
Last edited: