Source: National Institutes of Health Date: October 11, 2018 URL: http://list.nih.gov/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A0=NIH-MECFS_INFORMATION News from NIH: ME/CFS Telebriefing- October 23, 2018 ---------------------------------------------------- We request your participation in a telebriefing about updates on NIH's efforts to advance research on ME/CFS. The telebriefing will be held on October 23, 2018, 12:00 pm until 1:00 pm ET. If you will be calling from the U.S., please use the following dial-in information for the telebriefing. Dial-in: 866-844-9416 Participant passcode: 7178985 If you will be calling from another country, please see the attached chart for your country's access information. (Presumably available via link) Please remember to register at NIHME-CFSWorkingG@ninds.nih.gov if you plan to join the call. Thank you in advance for your participation and we look forward to an engaging, thoughtful, and productive conversation. Regards, The Trans-NIH ME/CFS Working Group
Thanks for doing that - yes, you've done it right and can see your listing here: https://www.s4me.info/calendar/
Who are these people and is it something where we tell them what we think or ask questions or are they just broadcasting their thoughts like a podcast?
I registered and logged in and only see this So we have to e-mail and request to join the call? So what was the logging in about?
I understand, its a general question to anyone who knows Have you participated on any of these calls before?
I forgot about this. I hope some people did listen in or it would give the impression that there is not much interest in such events. This would not be a good message, especially when complaining about the closing of the CFSAC. I would have been more likely to remember it if they had mentioned who the speakers were going to be.
Yes, same. I'm interested to hear from anyone who was on the call. I'd like to get confirmation that Walitt has been replaced on the NIH Post-Infectious ME/CFS study and know who has replaced him (as well as, of course, hearing how they are going with the study and how they responded to any calls for more funding).
https://twitter.com/user/status/1054769561772441600 https://twitter.com/user/status/1054773170845241344 https://twitter.com/user/status/1054775834588966912 https://twitter.com/user/status/1054776968611328002
https://twitter.com/user/status/1065444068270972931 https://twitter.com/user/status/1065444843214856192 https://twitter.com/user/status/1065448391570792448 https://twitter.com/user/status/1065449952632061952
Is this good or bad overall? Montoya leading the meeting is awesome. Program announcements being considered for ME but the whole process being replaced is... ? Not very surprising that there are few grants submitted. No one in their right mind will stake their research career on something that may be dried of funds whenever someone feels like it. Only very motivated researchers will take that risk, so it's no wonder so many either have a personal connection to a patient or have already firmly established careers in other areas of research. That's also why a lot of useless research is being done in other diseases because it's always safe. Maybe that's why the whole process is being replaced? There's clearly a lot of needs that are unmet at the expense of research that adds little to no understanding.
Assuming the NIH is not gaslighting us this seems to be a Mexican Standoff. The major players have tried for years to get money through repeated applications but got hung out to dry. They are either applying and still being denied or don't want to waste more resources after being burned so many times. Assuming the NIH is not gaslighting us and there really is money available... I don't have twitter but if someone wants to link my post or copy and paste it in a reply to that tweet please do.