1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 8th April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Nobel Prize of Medicine 2020

Discussion in 'Other health news and research' started by Milo, Oct 5, 2020.

Tags:
  1. Milo

    Milo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,108
    Mithriel, Chezboo, AliceLily and 19 others like this.
  2. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,507
    Location:
    Belgium
    Thanks for highlighting this @Milo

    I wasn't following things closely back then, but from what I remember Alter was a proponent of a connection between XMRV and CFS symptoms.
     
    Milo, alktipping, sebaaa and 3 others like this.
  3. Leila

    Leila Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,157
    If Harvey Alter is a scientist at Nobel Prize level, how could he have been wrong about xmrv?

    How likely is it he made a mistake or was "fooled" by Mikovits' work?

    I did follow the story when it all started and the yrs following. I still can't wrap my head around it.
     
    duncan, Legend and Invisible Woman like this.
  4. Hoopoe

    Hoopoe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,252
    Even good scientists get it wrong. Then they admit it. The bad ones don't.
     
    MSEsperanza, EzzieD, Amw66 and 13 others like this.
  5. Milo

    Milo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,108
    Dr Alter if i remember well, was the chairman of a ‘State of the knowledge’ conference that gathered all the ME experts around 2011 or 2012. He is a compassionate man and was extremely professional and highly respected.
     
    ukxmrv, Leila and ME/CFS Skeptic like this.
  6. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,159
    Location:
    Australia
    There are also degrees and types of wrong.
     
  7. Forbin

    Forbin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,581
    Location:
    USA
    It's interesting to note that Harvey Alter won the Nobel Prize for work conducted in (and prior to) 1988 and which was published in 1989.

    He was in his mid-50's then and is 85 now.

    There is usually a very long delay between doing the work that wins the Nobel Prize and actually winning it. My guess is that the committee wants to see if the work passes the test of time. They're probably not too keen on the idea of giving the prize for something that might be invalidated later.

    The shortest delay I can think of in the modern era occured when the prize in physics was given to the team that discovered that not only is expansion of the universe not slowing down, it is actually accelerating. That discovery was announced in 1998 and the prize was given just 13 years later, in 2011.
     
    Yessica, Hutan, Leila and 2 others like this.
  8. Milo

    Milo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,108
    https://www.nih.gov/news-events/new...-wins-2020-nobel-prize-physiology-or-medicine

     
    Yessica, Forbin, Hutan and 2 others like this.
  9. Mike Dean

    Mike Dean Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    147
    Location:
    York, UK
    Nobel humour - they accelerated the award to match the discovery.
     
    Milo, 2kidswithME, Forbin and 3 others like this.
  10. Mithriel

    Mithriel Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,816
    He was not fooled by Mikovitz or make a mistake. Mouse leukaemia like viruses exist, that is not controversial. They are the cause of a deadly epidemic among koala bears for instance. He identified ones which were X, unable to infect mice anymore and P forms which still can.

    He became very frustrated because they kept asking him to run tests to prove there was no contamination. Eventually he run out of samples and they announced this was a "virtual" retraction.

    The controversy was if X/PMRVs were prevalent in the human population and they found the answer they wanted. When they infected gibbons to see what would happen the virus was undetectable in blood after a few weeks but the lymph nodes were full of them.... So they looked at blood samples from blood donors.

    I don't think that XMRV is particularly connected with ME but the "evidence" against it made no sense.

    1. All reagents were contaminated so that is why positive results were found. They could not say how they became contaminated but suggested that mice may have piddled on the jars while they were in storage.

    2. No other teams could detect XMRV in samples so it was an artefact in the teams that claimed to have found it.

    3. XMRV was created in lab tissue samples in a single recombinant event they deduced happened about 1990(?) After this all cell lines were infected. This was after some of the ME epidemics so there could be no connection with ME.

    Many mammals have mouse leukaemia like viruses as they have lived in close proximity with them for generations. No one has ever explained why it should be different for humans.

    Harvey Alter first heard about ME then and was aghast at how we were treated. It heartened me that a proper scientist and doctor who looked at us without any prejudgements saw us so clearly.
     
    ukxmrv, 2kidswithME, Hutan and 2 others like this.

Share This Page