PACE trial TSC and TMG minutes ordered released

Discussion in 'Psychosomatic research - ME/CFS and Long Covid' started by JohnTheJack, Feb 21, 2018.

  1. JohnTheJack

    JohnTheJack Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,789
    Just received decision in the post. Not read it all but ICO has ordered release of TSC and TMG minutes.
     
    Joel, adreno, Moosie and 59 others like this.
  2. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,563
    Location:
    UK
    I think that is great. I think there are serious questions about the approval of the outcome switching and what was given as reasons to the committees.
     
    Joel, ladycatlover, Jan and 20 others like this.
  3. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,006
    Location:
    UK
    Well done! Why those committees didn't seem to exercise appropriate oversight has always been a big question.
     
    anniekim, Joel, Moosie and 21 others like this.
  4. Daisymay

    Daisymay Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    686
    Excellent....is that trial steering committee and management? committee.
     
    ladycatlover, Jan, Allele and 13 others like this.
  5. guest001

    guest001 Guest

    Excellent! Another bad day for the psyches. :D
     
    ladycatlover, Jan, Allele and 16 others like this.
  6. Nellie

    Nellie Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    UK
    TSC and TMG What do they stand for?
     
  7. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,006
    Location:
    UK
    Trial Steering Committee and Trial Management Group.
     
    ladycatlover, Jan, Allele and 18 others like this.
  8. JohnTheJack

    JohnTheJack Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,789
    Yes.
     
    ladycatlover, Jan, Allele and 8 others like this.
  9. Invisible Woman

    Invisible Woman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    10,280
    Forestvon, Joel, Moosie and 18 others like this.
  10. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    55,414
    Location:
    UK
    Well done, @JohnTheJack. Is there a timescale for when they have to be released, and can they appeal against the ICO decision?
     
    Moosie, ladycatlover, Jan and 13 others like this.
  11. JohnTheJack

    JohnTheJack Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,789
    Thanks. It relied heavily on data released by Alem so it's very much his work as well.

    35 calendar days to release. They can appeal, but decision suggests there have been negotiations between QMUL and ICO on what can be redacted, and my impression is that this time they won't appeal.
     
    Forestvon, Joel, Moosie and 39 others like this.
  12. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,064
    Location:
    Australia
    :thumbup:

    Be interesting to see what they redact.
     
    Joel, Moosie, ladycatlover and 12 others like this.
  13. Daisymay

    Daisymay Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    686
    Two possible scenarios of the kind of things that might be redacted:

    "Look guys, I'm sorry to tell you it's looking as if the results will be shit unless we change this, drop that, tweak this and ignore that, and bring in statisticians expert in fiddling results. So hands up all those in agreement with allowing us to carry out these changes?....Great, thanks lads for the unanimous vote. See you at the health insurance industry's annual bash next week in the Seychelles."

    or

    " Yes I know Mrs Boniface, this isn't the sort of thing you have expertise in as chairperson of the Oxfordshire WVS, yes it is all very complicated and the statistics are hard to grasp I know, but I can assure you that all the changes we are proposing are perfectly legitimate and in accord with the very highest level of research practice, all you have to do is trust us, you know we're psychiatrists of the highest integrity with the patients best interests at heart."
     
    adreno, ladycatlover, Jan and 16 others like this.
  14. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    One wonders at what stage someone thinks it worth applying for "whistleblower" status. It would surely be in the public interest.
     
  15. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    55,414
    Location:
    UK
    'Minutes' vary enormously.

    Some I've seen detail every point raised in a discussion, with the speakers named.

    Others simply list decisions reached and who is to action them without giving any clue about who said what and whether anyone dissented.

    Some are very formal, with motions proposed and seconded and votes cast with numbers recorded.

    Let's hope it's the first of these, though if it is, it will be heavily redacted.
     
    ladycatlover, Jan, Allele and 18 others like this.
  16. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,092
    Well we could play guess the redaction for some sport. A bit like on "have I got news for You" where they guess the headlines

    [​IMG]
     
    Hutan, ladycatlover, Jan and 12 others like this.
  17. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,769
    Yep
    we could project selective quotes onto buildings for Millions Missing.....
     
    MEMarge, Hutan, ladycatlover and 10 others like this.
  18. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    Amazing work.

    I'd just been discussing making a request for those, but had been dreading the amount of work I thoght it would be. It will be very interesting to just read the ICO report, and see how QMUL tried to argue against release.

    Thank you so much for this.
     
    Forestvon, MEMarge, Moosie and 12 others like this.
  19. Louie41

    Louie41 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,341
    Location:
    upper Midwest US
    What is the ICO? What is the significance of this for members who don't know the legal setup in the UK?
     
  20. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,006
    Location:
    UK
    The ICO is the Information Commissioner's Office: "The UK’s independent authority set up to uphold information rights in the public interest, promoting openness by public bodies and data privacy for individuals."

    QMUL must either now comply with the ICO's ruling or go to court to fight it, I think.
     

Share This Page