Persistent Poor Health Post-COVID-19 Is Not Associated with Respiratory Complications or Initial Disease Severity, 2021, Townsend et al

Tom Kindlon

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
‘Long Covid’ can affect people even with mild initial symptoms – study

TCD researchers find persistent fatigue and ill-health unrelated to severity of infection
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/hea...en-with-mild-initial-symptoms-study-1.4452710

Irish study. Neither the paper nor the article mentions "chronic fatigue syndrome" though a measure of fatigue is one of the focuses of the (open access) paper

---
Abstract

Rationale:

Much is known about the acute infective process of SARS-CoV-2, the causative virus of the COVID-19 pandemic. The marked inflammatory response and coagulopathic state in acute SARS-CoV-2 may promote pulmonary fibrosis. However, little is known of the incidence and seriousness of post-COVID pulmonary pathology. Objectives: We describe respiratory recovery and self-reported health following infection at time of outpatient attendance.

Methods:

Infection severity was graded into three groups: (i) not requiring admission, (ii) requiring hospital admission, and (iii) requiring ICU care. Participants underwent chest radiography and six-minute-walk test (6MWT). Fatigue and subjective return to health were assessed and levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6, soluble CD25 and D-dimer were measured. The association between initial illness and abnormal chest x-ray, 6MWT distance and perception of maximal exertion was investigated.

Results:

487 patients were offered an outpatient appointment, of which 153 (31%) attended for assessment at a median of 75 days after diagnosis. 74 (48%) had required hospital admission during acute infection. Persistently abnormal chest x-rays were seen in 4%. The median 6MWT distance covered was 460m. Reduced distance covered was associated with frailty and length of inpatient stay. 95 (62%) felt that they had not returned to full health, while 47% met the case definition for fatigue. Ongoing ill-health and fatigue were associated with increased perception of exertion. None of the measures of persistent respiratory disease were associated with initial disease severity.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the rates of objective respiratory disease and subjective respiratory symptoms following COVID-19 and the complex multifactorial nature of post-COVID ill-health.

https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1175OC
 
Neither the paper nor the article mentions "chronic fatigue syndrome" though a measure of fatigue is one of the focuses of the (open access) paper

I think two factors contribute to the reluctance of classifying it as CFS. First, many guidelines require a minimum period after symptom onset (typically 6 months) until a diagnosis can be made. Second, some medical circles have not even accepted CFS as a diagnosis and still consider it a psychiatric disease. If they associated COVID-19 with a psychiatric disease, the whole idea of the psyche as causality might become unfounded. For medical scientists who try to fit into the overall consensus, it might appear wise to avoid topics that are debated controversially. This avoids unnecessary discussions with people who are still trying to defend this psychiatric theory. It isn't even the main point of this study.

Regardless, at some point, they will all have to admit that COVID-19 causes chronic fatigue and psychiatric issues. If these psychiatric issues are caused by a virus, how many others are as well? Is it the right way to fixate on the treatment of the psyche as a causal factor then?
 
Wow. There is now a case definition for fatigue???

"Fatigue was assessed using the validated Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ-11) (35, 36). Participants are asked to answer these questions with reference to the past month in comparison to their pre-COVID-19 baseline, with responses measured on a Likert scale (0-3). From this a global score can be constructed out of a total of 33. This method is validated and closely resembles other fatigue questionnaires (37-40)"
 
"Fatigue was assessed using the validated Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ-11) (35, 36). Participants are asked to answer these questions with reference to the past month in comparison to their pre-COVID-19 baseline, with responses measured on a Likert scale (0-3). From this a global score can be constructed out of a total of 33. This method is validated and closely resembles other fatigue questionnaires (37-40)"
What the hell.
 
Back
Top Bottom