Physical function and psychosocial outcomes after a 6-month self-paced aquatic exercise program for individuals with [ME/CFS], 2025, Broadbent+

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by SNT Gatchaman, Apr 6, 2025.

  1. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,177
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Yes. And it's so much more career enhancing to say 'This RCT provides evidence of efficacy and safety for low-intensity aquatic exercise rehabilitation rather than 'this RCT provides evidence that our expensive intervention is no better than doing nothing'.
     
    rvallee, Eleanor, Sean and 5 others like this.
  2. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    14,553
    Location:
    Canada
    It's so misleading to use terms like this knowing that they mean something very different in a press release. They mean statistically significant, and even where sometimes it's clinically significant, it's always the barest blip above it, or often even right on it. Nothing in "Imagine a world"-based medicine rates above the smallest most trivial outcome.

    But in a press release saying that something is improved significantly is interpreted as meaning "a lot". Most people would probably rate this as meaning a huge difference.

    So is this:
    None are adequately controlled. None are robust. But they use robust to signify that this is indisputably beneficial.

    Very dishonest. About as deceitful as "Now with 35% more", when the company decides the base quantity, and could just as well make it 5% and call it 20x in bonus. Means absolutely nothing.
     
    Peter Trewhitt and Utsikt like this.

Share This Page