Poll - Have you been tested for Sjogren's Syndrome?

Has your doctor tested you for Sjogren's Syndrome?

  • Yes - I tested positive and I have dry eyes and dry mouth

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • Yes - I tested positive but I don't have dry eyes and dry mouth

    Votes: 4 5.8%
  • Yes - I tested negative

    Votes: 15 21.7%
  • No - I have never been tested

    Votes: 41 59.4%
  • I don't know if my doctor has tested me

    Votes: 7 10.1%

  • Total voters
    69
Come on, what are you basing this on? I have not seen a shred of evidence for ME/CFS being linked to Sjoigren's other than in that people with "Sjogren's" are said to have a lot of fatigue (which of course people with ME/CFS deny they have). Sjogren's is the most fringe of rheumatological diagnoses with private practitioners all over diagnosing it by magic. Nobody much on this forum has sicca syndrome as far as I know, or Ro antibodies.

What you have said so far seems to be vague handwaving.

" Nobody much on this forum has sicca syndrome as far as I know, " = I think this is unfair to claim without measuring their tears and saliva, right?
 
Sjogren's doesn't have PEM. Who cares if some other symptoms overlap? You can be deficient in iron or B12 which can result in fatigue, but that doesn't mean you have ME/CFS or Sjogrens.
sorry but you're also gaslighting here Sjogrens' patients. No, Sjogrens fatigue is not deficiency of iron, I have enough friends with PEM who haven't left their homes for a DECADE, due to PEM, SFN, dysautonomia, and YES, they have positive SSA, salivary gland biopsy and salivary ultrasound (in a University hospital - not in 'private practice' which Johnathan Edwards speaks about - p.s. can I get a contact of these private physicians who give diagnoses by magic? asking for insurance purposes).
 
LOL, so what is causing PEM in Sjögren's patients who have PEM? Can you provide proof that Sjögren's doesn't include symptoms of PEM? The research is also pretty consistent that neurological involvement of Sjogren's can precede sicca by a decade.

That's easy. Most people diagnosed with Sjogren's in private clinics probably do not have it. Even in my NHS clinic the majority of people who thought they had Sjogren's didn't. Some of them probably have ME/CFS. It might not sound so good for reimbursement and stuff though.

Neurological involvement in Sjogren's does occur but doesn't have much to do with the clinical picture of ME/CFS. Features of ME/CFS don't get called neurological involvement because so far we don't have clinical evidence that they are neurological, even if we suspect that.
 
" Nobody much on this forum has sicca syndrome as far as I know, " = I think this is unfair to claim without measuring their tears and saliva, right?

You don't have to measure anything to know you have dry eyes. A positive test without symptoms is probably meaningless.
 
This kind of comparison doesn't stand here. Because Sjogren's would be higher in hierarchy, with known pathology in B cells and hyperactivity, prone to multiple positive autoantibodies,
There’s not much of that in ME/CFS. If it was true that a «huge %» of ME/CFS cases actually was Sjögren’s or had comorbid Sjögren’s, don’t you think similar findings would have shown up in studies on ME/CFS by now?
and often causing various neurological complications - for example, SFN (and therefore dysautonomia/POTS) s a symptom of Sjogren's has been finally added to the criteria in 2024, among neurological complications of Sjogren's.
Do you mean orthostatic intolerance? I’m not sure we know much about what causes that. Maybe I’ve missed some studies? Please share if you’re sitting on some convincing ones.
Previously, large fiber neuropathies and cranial neuropathies as well as MS-like CNS involvement, were already there. So, Sjogren's is a systemic disease and an attack on the nervous system is one of the common complications. Meaning, one of the symptoms of Sjogrens is sometimes POTS, MECFS.
There are no signs of neuronal damage in ME/CFS so far, and certainly not on the scale of MS. DecodeME can be taken to imply neuronal involvement in ME/CFS, but that’s different from the kind of damage observed in MS.
LOL, so what is causing PEM in Sjögren's patients who have PEM? Can you provide proof that Sjögren's doesn't include symptoms of PEM? The research is also pretty consistent that neurological involvement of Sjogren's can precede sicca by a decade.
How do you define PEM?

I’m asking because it frequently is described as simply a worsening of symptoms following exertion, but that’s far too broad because it would also involved exercise intolerance, DOMS, rapid fatigueability etc. Those are aspects of ME/CFS (probably primarily due to deconditioning), but they are not a part of PEM.

If you take PEM to include exercise intolerance, you could say that very many diseases have PEM.
 
You don't have to measure anything to know you have dry eyes. A positive test without symptoms is probably meaningless.

We should look up how do ophthalmologists define dry eye, pretty sure it's by low tear on Schirmer and that even if you don't feel issues (like myself) you are advised to use eye drops, like I was, to prevent corneal damage.
 
Do you mean orthostatic intolerance? I’m not sure we know much about what causes that. Maybe I’ve missed some studies? Please share if you’re sitting on some convincing ones.


How do you define PEM?

I’m asking because it frequently is described as simply a worsening of symptoms following exertion, but that’s far too broad because it would also involved exercise intolerance, DOMS, rapid fatigueability etc. Those are aspects of ME/CFS (probably primarily due to deconditioning), but they are not a part of PEM.

If you take PEM to include exercise intolerance, you could say that very many diseases have PEM.

Sorry, but I find these nuances of PEM ridiculous because it's all arbitrary definitions that even 2 MECFS patients among themselves can't agree on and basically comes down to biological proof of what ME is, so once you have that, we can discuss the differences. Until then you're equally wrong as I am because you're making your own definitions (as a group).

There’s not much of that in ME/CFS. If it was true that a «huge %» of ME/CFS cases actually was Sjögren’s or had comorbid Sjögren’s, don’t you think similar findings would have shown up in studies on ME/CFS by now?

But it did show up in studies.


I am not even sure what is not plausible here, the data says about 50% of large fiber neuropathy females had Sjogrens confirmed, high rates in NMOSD too, in SFN, POTS as well.

There are no signs of neuronal damage in ME/CFS so far, and certainly not on the scale of MS. DecodeME can be taken to imply neuronal involvement in ME/CFS, but that’s different from the kind of damage observed in MS.

Isn't there confirmed SFN in a significant % of MECFS patients?
 
And PEM isn't fatigue. If your friends have true PEM, they also have ME/CFS. If fatigue is their main issue, that's a Sjogren's thing I guess.

They have Sjogren's, giving symptoms of PEM, MECFS... as Sjogren's is higher in hierarchy and can cause many neuropsychiatric complications. They DONT have MECFS as a 'comorbidity'.

Why are you claiming that while Sjogren's is documented and known to cause very severe neurological conditions like NMOSD / paralysis, blindness, MS, motor neuropathies*... that it can't cause PEM? PEM is just a set of symptoms, anyway.

*perhaps because you're not aware of research in neurological autoimmune illnesses and how big % of those patients have Sjogren's too.
 
Sorry, but I find these nuances of PEM ridiculous because it's all arbitrary definitions that even 2 MECFS patients among themselves can't agree on and basically comes down to biological proof of what ME is, so once you have that, we can discuss the differences. Until then you're equally wrong as I am because you're making your own definitions (as a group).
I think we’re just going to have to disagree here. Feel free to elaborate on your stance in the PEM factsheet thread if you feel like there’s anything seriously wrong with the definition outlined there.
But it did show up in studies.
Which studies? I feel like I’m repeating myself, but you keep dodging the question.
I am not even sure what is not plausible here, the data says about 50% of large fiber neuropathy females had Sjogrens confirmed, high rates in NMOSD too, in SFN, POTS as well.
Where is this data from?
Isn't there confirmed SFN in a significant % of MECFS patients?
Where has that been confirmed?
 
We should look up how do ophthalmologists define dry eye, pretty sure it's by low tear on Schirmer and that even if you don't feel issues (like myself) you are advised to use eye drops, like I was, to prevent corneal damage.

And that'll be $100, many thanks?
I have spent my life in this business. I have looked after people with corneal damage from Sjogren's. I couldn't care less how an ophthalmologist wants to define dry eyes. I never met anyone without symptoms who came to harm. If they did then there should be a screening programme for all adults to have annual Schirmer tests. There comes a point when when needs to return to reality.
 
Higher in what hierarchy? Because we know more about it, it's a superior disease? You're not making any sense.

What even are Sjogren's giving symptoms of PEM? If they have PEM, they have ME/CFs whether or not they've been diagnosed with it.
 
I am sorry if I sound a bit dismissive about people's pet theories but S4ME is such a good place for trying to raise the level of debate and evidence for ME/CFS science and if we degenerate into hand waving statements based on private physicians' proclamations we will slide back into the morass we have barely crawled out of.
 
I had started to suspect that patients with ME/CFS were somehow getting diagnosed with “neurosjogren’s” instead, much like some seem to get inappropriately diagnosed with hEDS or chronic Lyme. @Jonathan Edwards am I understanding correctly that Sjogren’s could be overdiagnosed even when antibody tests and biopsies are used?
 
I am sorry if I sound a bit dismissive about people's pet theories but S4ME is such a good place for trying to raise the level of debate and evidence for ME/CFS science and if we degenerate into hand waving statements based on private physicians' proclamations we will slide back into the morass we have barely crawled out of.
I really agree. I’ve been getting a bit worried and frustrated with how often this happens on here lately.
 
This is 5+ years old, recently, there has been more research, especially with the formal inclusion of SFN on Sjogren's disease activity scales.

Neurologic involvement frequently preceded the diagnosis of SS
(81% of patients).


Neurological manifestations may precede the sicca symptoms in 40 to 93% of
the cases [8, 14]. As described by Mori et al. [11], 93% of patients were
diagnosed with pSS after neuropathy symptoms appeared.


Furthermore, CNS involvement may precede clinical diagnosis by many
years and may lead to an underestimation of other neurological and/or
systemic diseases [10].
Neurological onset often precedes by many years both the appearance of
systemic symptoms and the immunological diagnosis. Thus, pSS should
always be considered in patients with relatively nonspecific neurological
symptoms associated with sicca syndrome. MRI and neuropsychological
assessment are necessary for an early diagnosis, particularly when
neurological symptoms precede systemic involvement. Because of the great
heterogeneity of neurological involvement in pSS, neurological
complications should be the subject of large prospective cohort studies.

Neurological symptoms preceded the diagnosis of SS in eight patients.
Conclusions
Peripheral neuropathies are frequent in SS patients. Neurologists should be aware of possible
autoimmune causes of neuropathies because clinical manifestations of neuropathy may
precede the development of other symptoms of the autoimmune disease.
Peripheral neuropathy may be the first symptom, but may also develop later in
the course of the disease.

In 8 (35%) of 23 PNS+ patients, neurological symptoms preceded the diagnosis
of pSS.
Some of the previous studies suggest that nervous system involvement can be the
presenting feature of SS, while others report that it is rather a late finding in the course
of the disease (Govoni et al., 1999; Grant et al., 1997; Griffin et al., 1990; Malinow
et al., 1986; Mori et al., 2005; Vrethem et al., 1990). Berkowitz et al. found that
neurological symptoms preceded the diagnosis of SS in 81% of patients (Berkowitz &
Samuels, 2014). In another study, conducted by Seeliger et al., a diagnosis of Sjögren's
syndrome was made in 44 of 184 (24%) patients with symptoms and signs of a severe
progressive symmetric or asymmetric peripheral neuropathy (Seeliger et al., 2019). In
our group, neurological symptoms preceded the diagnosis of pSS in 35% of patients.
This fact implies that these are patients who will first report to a neurologist.

In our cohort, neurological manifestations preceded the sicca symptoms in 72.1% of the
patients, which is consistent with the findings of other studies. 17–19



In 25-92% of patients affected by Sjögren’s syndrome, neurological symptoms may precede
the sicca syndrome.

“At least one-third of patients with pSS can present with extraglandular involvement, with
neurological dysfunction being one of the most frequent conditions… In 25–60% of cases,
neurological symptoms are the first clinical manifestation and can precede the diagnosis of pSS
on an average of two years,” the scientists wrote.


Neurological manifestations may precede. SICCA symptoms, so all patients with
polyneuropathy would be tested for Sjogren's syndrome.

However, neurological manifestations occur in 10 to 60% of patients with Sjögren's
syndrome and can often precede classic sicca symptoms in Sjögren's syndrome in some
cases up to several years. Rarely, cranial neuropathy can be the initial presentation. Thus, it
is important to consider screening for Sjögren's syndrome in the evaluation of pediatric
patients with new onset of isolated cranial neuropathy even in the absence of classic sicca
symptoms.



Q: Can you explain this study in plain English?
A: Sure. Dysautonomia International collaborated with the neurologists at South Shore Neurologic
Associates in New York and Sjögren’s researchers at SUNY Buffalo. We looked at the records of all
of South Shore Neurologic Associates’ patients over the past year who reported either dry eye or
dry mouth symptoms, plus some kind of other autonomic problem, who didn’t have an
identifiable cause (meaning their dysautonomia was “idiopathic”), and who didn’t have the SS-A
and SS-B antibodies doctors common rely upon to diagnose Sjögren’s. Out of 95 idiopathic
dysautonomia patients included the study, we found that 41% of them had one or more novel
early Sjögren’s antibodies (salivary protein-1 [SP-1], parotid secretory protein [PSP], and/or
carbonic anhydrase-6 [CA-6]). Then we looked at the symptoms found in the antibody positive
patents compared to the symptoms in the antibody negative patients. They essentially had the
same symptom profiles, but the antibody positive patients were more likely to have constipation.
Q: Is Sjögren’s common in dysautonomia patients?
A: Sjögren’s is the second most common cause of autonomic neuropathy, after diabetes, and has
been associated with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, orthostatic hypotension,
orthostatic intolerance, autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy, gastroparesis, and other forms
of dysautonomia. In fact, the dry eye that Sjögren’s is well known for is a symptom of
dysautonomia, since the tear glands are controlled by the autonomic nervous system. 1 in 10
people who have dry eye have Sjögren’s syndrome. Sjögren’s impacts 4 million Americans, but 3
million of them are undiagnosed.

Q: Isn’t Sjögren’s an older woman’s disease?
A: The stereotypical Sjögren’s patients is a Caucasian woman over age 40. However,

Sjögren’s can occur in any race or ethnicity, and 10% of patients are male. While Sjögren’s
is not as common in children as it is in adults, it can occur at any age. The youngest novel
Sjögren’s antibody positive patient in our study was 13. Younger Sjögren’s patients tend
to present with different symptoms than older patients, with more neurological
symptoms and less dryness. The dryness usually develops slowly over time as the
disease progresses.
The current diagnostic criteria for Sjögren’s were developed based on studies of older
patients who have advanced/severe dryness associated with their Sjögren’s. Many experts
now agree that the current diagnostic criteria are not catching patients who are at an
earlier stage of the disease, who tend to be younger and have less severe dryness, when
you may actually be able to prevent some of the long term damage from occurring. People
diagnosed with Sjögren’s in their 50s have probably been dealing with it for 20-30 years
before they were “sick enough” to get diagnosed.

Neurologic Complications
A PRIMER ON THE NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS OF SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME
complications/
Neuro-Sjögren: Peripheral Neuropathy With Limb
Weakness in Sjögren's Syndrome
Small Fiber Neuropathy in Sjogren's Syndrome: A Review

review
Immunoglobulin Injections May be Effective for Peripheral Nerve Damage in Sjogren’s
Patients, Study Says

 
Higher in what hierarchy? Because we know more about it, it's a superior disease? You're not making any sense.

What even are Sjogren's giving symptoms of PEM? If they have PEM, they have ME/CFs whether or not they've been diagnosed with it.

Not superior. But MECFS is a set of symptoms? Sjogrens is defined from immunological profile and is multi-systemic, check the formal definition and disease activity scales. ONE part of symptoms is attack to the nervous system, it is known to cause many autoantibodies, B cells hyperactivity - thus high IgG. Some systems like peripheral nervous system is attacked more often.

So yes: from defining the disease pathology it is higher because Sjogrens can, in theory at least, cause MECFS symptoms, while MECFS can't cause Sjogrens. We also know much more about what is Sjogrens (immunologically) vs what is MECFS (for now: set of symptoms).

It is evident that people posting on this thread are not aware that Sjogren's is frequently causing severe neurological illnesses like NMOSD and CIDP, that can make one paralysed and blind, so I think the relying on 'I feel Sjogrens couldnt possibly cause something as bad as PEM' is just relying on prejudice, without information.
 
But what does neurological involvement in Sjogren’s actually look like? Where’s the evidence it looks like ME? It’s not enough to say Sjogren’s can have neuro involement, and ME might be neurological, so Sjogren’s can look like ME.

The quotes posted talk about dysautonomia and neuropathy, but neuropathy is not ME, and dysautonomia alone is not ME even though it often comes with it.
 
I’m homebound due to Sjogrens disease with post-exertional malaise (PEM) and small-fiber neuropathy (SFN). I’m SSA-positive and ANA-negative. My lip and minor salivary gland biopsies are positive. Aside from ME/CFS and SFN, I don’t have other symptoms, and I don’t really notice dryness because the PEM/ME-CFS symptoms are worse.
 
@Pibee what does any of those studies have to do with ME/CFS?

If you’re saying that Sjögrens can look identical to ME/CFS, you have to show that Sjögrens can cause enough ME/CFS symptoms to fulfil the diagnostic criteria.
 
Back
Top Bottom