Trial Report RESTORE ME: A RCT of Oxaloacetate for Improving Fatigue in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), 2024, Cash et al

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by forestglip, Oct 7, 2024.

  1. forestglip

    forestglip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    874
    RESTORE ME: A RCT of Oxaloacetate for Improving Fatigue in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)

    Alan B. Cash, Suzanne D. Vernon, Candace Rond, Saeed Abbaszadeh, Jen Bell, Brayden Yellman, David Kaufman

    *[Provisionally accepted, full text not yet available]*

    Abstract
    The energy metabolite oxaloacetate is significantly lower in the blood plasma of ME/CFS subjects. A previous open-label trial with oxaloacetate supplementation significantly reduced ME/CFS fatigue.

    In a follow-on trial, 82 ME/CFS subjects were enrolled in a 3-month randomized double blinded controlled trial using 2,000 mg oxaloacetate or control/day. The primary endpoints were safety and a reduction in fatigue from baseline. Secondary and exploratory endpoints reviewed functional capacity, and general health status.

    Results: Anhydrous enol-oxaloacetate (oxaloacetate) was well tolerated at the doses tested. Oxaloacetate significantly lowered fatigue from baseline by >25%, whereas the control group was not significant at ~10% reduction. Intergroup analysis of oxaloacetate and control measured shifted fatigue to lower levels in the oxaloacetate group (P= 0.0039), but with no significant shift in the control group. The oxaloacetate group had a higher percentage of subjects achieve a > 25% reduction in fatigue compared to the control group (P< 0.05). A subset of subjects that comprised 40.5% of the oxaloacetate group were "Enhanced Responders" with a 63% average fatigue reduction.

    Both physical and mental fatigue were improved by oxaloacetate. Oxaloacetate is well-tolerated and helps to reduce fatigue in ME/CFS.

    Link (Frontiers in Neurology)
     
    pooriepoor91, shak8, Hutan and 6 others like this.
  2. Denise

    Denise Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    502
    The first author (Alan B. Cash) works for a company that produces oxaloacetate.
    (just pointing it out)
     
    sebaaa, alktipping, shak8 and 11 others like this.
  3. Mij

    Mij Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,559
    I posted my results on the other thread. My levels were very low. They are referring to the supplement as 'medical food grade'. What does that mean exactly?

    Here we have clinical trials using Anhydrous Enol-oxaloacetate for brain function fatigue in cancer patients. I'm pretty sure they're not experiencing delayed PEM.

    LINK
     
    alktipping, Hutan, forestglip and 2 others like this.
  4. Denise

    Denise Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    502
    The term medical food, as defined in section 5(b) of the Orphan Drug Act (21 U.S.C. 360ee (b) (3)) is "a food which is formulated to be consumed or administered enterally under the supervision of a physician and which is intended for the specific dietary management of a disease or condition for which distinctive nutritional requirements, based on recognized scientific principles, are established by medical evaluation."
    https://www.fda.gov/food/guidance-d...ods-guidance-documents-regulatory-information
     
  5. Mij

    Mij Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,559
    Ok, so is food grade considered the same as pharmaceutical grade that falls under the same classification as a drug?
     
  6. Denise

    Denise Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    502
    I think pharma grade means there are stricter standards than medical food grade. (But I am not a specialist in "FDA speak")
     
  7. hotblack

    hotblack Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    347
    Location:
    UK
  8. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    29,374
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Given this trial was conducted at the Bateman Horne Centre, it is perhaps surprising to not see Lucinda Bateman's name on the study, as I assume she would have been the lead clinician assessing patients, and that usually warrants an authorship.

    There were a lot of problems with the initial study, and the journal has now put a note on that study, discussed on the relevant thread, but copied here:
    It is hard to know what to make of this new study given the conflicts of interest of a number of the authors is so strong i.e. the study serves as a marketing tool for a very expensive supplement.

    If people are considering this treatment, it's worth reading the various threads we have on it e.g Oxaloacetate. Click on the 'oxaloacetate' tag on the top left of the thread for the full list.
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2024
  9. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    15,175
    Location:
    London, UK
    There area number of unclear aspects to the abstract text that worry me. We should be getting a straight report of a predefined primary endpoint. It is very unclear what the p value of 0.0039 refers to. If the study is robust it is important so why not write a clear abstract?
     
    alktipping, Trish, hotblack and 2 others like this.
  10. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    29,374
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    As far as I can see, the abstract is all we have for now. The abstract has a 'provisionally accepted' note on it.
     
    alktipping, Trish, hotblack and 2 others like this.
  11. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    15,175
    Location:
    London, UK
    Provisionally accepted usually means subject to some required improvements!!
     
    MeSci, obeat, janice and 6 others like this.

Share This Page