Simon Wessely on Covid-19

Discussion in 'Epidemics (including Covid-19, not Long Covid)' started by Sly Saint, Mar 16, 2020.

  1. John Mac

    John Mac Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,006
    They are probably massaging his ego as he will become very useful to them over the coming months/years when he becomes an 'expert' on all the people who fail to recover fully from Covid-19.
     
    MEMarge, Woolie, ukxmrv and 7 others like this.
  2. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,064
    Location:
    Australia
  3. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,736
    Amw66, ukxmrv and MEMarge like this.
  4. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,662
    Location:
    Canada
    And on the terrorism bit, no mention that he dismissed the 9/11 WTC health problems as mass hysteria. He's basically the right person to ask for those things, as long as you generally do the opposite of what he thinks is a good idea. That's his talent: he is a genius at being wrong. No idea how being wrong turned into a respectable career as a medical reverse seer. I guess that's the persuasion bit. Dude would have made a killing selling timeshares or hyping MLMs.
     
  5. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    55,414
    Location:
    UK
    ?
     
  6. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,662
    Location:
    Canada
    Multi-level marketing. Good old pyramid schemes in new bottles.
     
    EzzieD, FMMM1, MEMarge and 4 others like this.
  7. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,736
  8. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    15,175
    Location:
    London, UK
    “There is a long history of infections as a trigger but other factors contributing to longer term disability,” adds Wessely. “If the virus is found to enter the brain, this might increase the risk.”

    A nice example of a completely groundless piece of personal opinion.
     
    ukxmrv, EzzieD, ladycatlover and 8 others like this.
  9. Leila

    Leila Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,182
    I didn't know about the WTC victims! Didn't that cause a major backlash from Americans scientists?

    If he got away with this on such an emotional and traumatizing issue, I don't see why he wouldn't in post covid patiens.
     
  10. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,662
    Location:
    Canada
    To clarify, he meant this about the subsequent health problems, mostly cancers, that the survivors still experience to this day. It took years until those problems were accepted, in part because of people like him dismissing them, so having made those claims in 2003 was not super controversial. Now it's old history I guess. Being wrong about pushing stuff like mass hysteria somehow never gets anyone in trouble, even though people and institutions do act on this advice and so it has real-world consequences but never on those making the extraordinary claims.

    Psychosomatics is like the eternal loser favorite kid that always gets in trouble but never faces consequences. Much harm, zero foul. It's extremely broken but people just can't quit it, it's like a drug.
     
    hinterland, ukxmrv, EzzieD and 7 others like this.
  11. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,064
    Location:
    Australia
    Megalomania is incurable.
     
  12. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,662
    Location:
    Canada
    Only distancing works. If only we had that option.
     
    ukxmrv, Sean, Invisible Woman and 2 others like this.
  13. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,420
    I guess megalomania is sort of vertical social distancing.
     
  14. James Morris-Lent

    James Morris-Lent Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    United States
    It has seemed to me that some BPS-type commentators have done their utmost to get out ahead of the Coronavirus situation by saying exactly what is most convenient for 'experts' to have said, from the position of politicians who wish to claim no responsibility.

    Which is to imply that the traumatizing effect of social distancing and immediate-term economic fear and strain is roughly morally equivalent to the potential casualties of more or less allowing the virus to spread. So this just helps them justify acting in a half-assed manner, taking credit for any benefits and hedging against any shortcomings or negative consequences. Anybody who complains is irrational and uncaring somehow.

    This seems par for the course for the BPS career. Their whole bit is designed to remove responsibility from health systems and insurers, directly onto patients. If you disagree with them, you're some anti-mental-health bigot crazy. This course of action has been strongly incentivized for decades so why not keep on the gravy train.
     
    Hoopoe, ukxmrv, hinterland and 17 others like this.
  15. Suffolkres

    Suffolkres Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,628
    Tomorrow https://www.rsm.ac.uk/resources/rsm-live/

    https://www.rsm.ac.uk/events/rsm-studios/2019-20/pen65/

    We invite you to join us as we continue the COVID-19 series. Tune into our free, interactive webinars to keep informed and stay connected with health professionals, leading experts and decision makers, wherever you are.
    Episode 6 - Policymaking on masks for the general public: evidence-based or eminence-based medicine?
    Date: Tuesday 21 April 2020
    Time: 12:30pm - 1:00pm

    Professor Trish Greenhalgh, Professor of Primary Care Health Sciences, joins Professor Sir Simon Wessely to explore the impact of COVID-19 on primary care services, now and in the future. They will also discuss the evidence surrounding face masks, policy, innovation and change in the response to COVID-19.
    Professor Trish Greenhalgh
    Professor of Primary Care Health Sciences, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford

    Free to watch on Zoom, join us at 12:30pm tomorrow.
     
    ladycatlover and Esther12 like this.
  16. Suffolkres

    Suffolkres Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,628
    Don't bother- lightweight...
     
    ukxmrv and MEMarge like this.
  17. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    The Greenhalgh one had some stuff about covid being so complex that it's difficult to run useful RCTs, which are much more useful for testing drugs.

    Maybe if she thought about the complexity of testing forms of biopsychosocial rehabilitation on condition like 'CFS' she might realise that was pretty complex too?

    Youtube's dodgy transcript (anyone interested is probably better off heading to 4:40 in the video (though there is the usual shudder of Simon chatting with his old friend Trisha):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WuPLfTua2k




     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2020
    Invisible Woman, Wonko and Saz94 like this.
  18. JaneL

    JaneL Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    364
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Apologies for cross-posting, but what I posted on the coronavirus - worldwide spread and control thread probably belongs here:

    Wessely’s name appears on a number of publications that have been used as evidence for “SPI-B” who are the SAGE subcommittee on behavioural and social interventions. Rubin’s name crops too.

    https://assets.publishing.service.g...t_data/file/873741/09-spi-b-evidence-list.pdf

    I found out about this in the following article in the The Guardian:
    https://www.theguardian.com/comment...wing-the-science-coronavirus-advice-political

    https://www.s4me.info/threads/coronavirus-worldwide-spread-and-control.13287/page-137#post-256819
     
  19. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,924
    Location:
    UK
  20. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    I wish someone would ask him whether he believes that Imboden et al's conclusions as to the factors leading to perpetuation of symptoms after Asian flu will hold good for Covid 19, and, if not, why he thought them relevant to ME, and how he distinguishes them.
     
    Amw66 and MEMarge like this.

Share This Page