rvallee
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
So... they're spinning a failed trial into a feasibility trial? Since it didn't produce the outcomes they expected, they're basically saying: "welp, we know we can do this thing, which has been done thousands of times before, don't mind the data we produced, not valid because, uh, reasons".
How much money was wasted on what is basically "can we get people to drink a glass of water, then report how thirsty they are after?", which has been set to waste even more because they didn't get the results they wanted?
And of course that retention rate. Now that's how you know something is a waste of time.
Do they think they have to find the magic words? The perfect explanation? The right tone? They keep doing these trials the same way over and over again. Without changing anything substantial. This is seriously an even worse scandal than the amyloid AD thing, because they aren't trying different solutions to fix an issue that isn't the real problem, they are trying the same solution every single time to solve an issue that isn't the real problem, or even A real problem.
Oh wow, didn't even notice it's Chalder. Who did a feasibility study on a formula she used dozens of times, the exact same formula. Who keeps funding these people?! No wonder everything is so broken.
How much money was wasted on what is basically "can we get people to drink a glass of water, then report how thirsty they are after?", which has been set to waste even more because they didn't get the results they wanted?
And of course that retention rate. Now that's how you know something is a waste of time.
Do they think they have to find the magic words? The perfect explanation? The right tone? They keep doing these trials the same way over and over again. Without changing anything substantial. This is seriously an even worse scandal than the amyloid AD thing, because they aren't trying different solutions to fix an issue that isn't the real problem, they are trying the same solution every single time to solve an issue that isn't the real problem, or even A real problem.
Oh wow, didn't even notice it's Chalder. Who did a feasibility study on a formula she used dozens of times, the exact same formula. Who keeps funding these people?! No wonder everything is so broken.