Esther12
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Excerpt:
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/05/faking-cancer-online/588334/
I thought that this article was a bit interesting in relation to some of the controversies around ME/CFS.
eg an indication someone somewhere has been faking/exaggerating CFS symptoms can be presented as challenging the legitimacy of other patients' symptoms in a way that it obviously wouldn't be re cancer.
Also, while I think that it's a bit pointless trying to engage critically with other peoples' internet anecdotes, and can often be counter-productive, it does seem unfair to present any patient scepticism about someone who is trying to make money from LP and claiming that it led to them recovering as abusive opposition to psychological treatments.
My general instinct is to not trust anything I read unless I can verify it with a range of independent sources.
This was not the first time many of the group’s members had felt this way. As harrowing as the experience can be for those involved, people in online cancer support groups are routinely outed as healthy. It’s difficult to speculate exactly how common this phenomenon is: There have been no large-scale scientific investigations into the internet’s cancer fakers, and the evidence is limited to only those who have actually been suspected or caught. But among the internet’s cancer communities, it’s an often acknowledged problem, albeit still a shocking one. Among 10 people from three groups I spoke with recently, every person recalled someone being outed for faking in their communities at least once, if not more.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/05/faking-cancer-online/588334/
I thought that this article was a bit interesting in relation to some of the controversies around ME/CFS.
eg an indication someone somewhere has been faking/exaggerating CFS symptoms can be presented as challenging the legitimacy of other patients' symptoms in a way that it obviously wouldn't be re cancer.
Also, while I think that it's a bit pointless trying to engage critically with other peoples' internet anecdotes, and can often be counter-productive, it does seem unfair to present any patient scepticism about someone who is trying to make money from LP and claiming that it led to them recovering as abusive opposition to psychological treatments.
My general instinct is to not trust anything I read unless I can verify it with a range of independent sources.
Last edited: