Three part article on cognitive therapies, mindfulness, Garner etc., 2025, Long Covid Advocacy Substack article

Andy said:
Two different explanations so far.....
Click to expand...
I took it to mean that they are trying to prepare their readers for how to deal with BPS arguments in general. But they think it’s going to be extra relevant when DecodeME is published because of the waves it’s going to make.

So preparing for how to react to BPS reactions. Not how to preemptively address BPS reactions.
 
Brain activity is the exertion. Being exposed to a complex environment with many different things going on, music, people, and so on is exertion, even if the person is just sitting there. The brain has to process all this and when it's fatiguable it won't be able to do it for long. As it becomes tired, it will become distractible and the person will try to withdraw, either mentally by intentionally paying less attention to the outside world, or physically by seeking a quiet place.

Physical activity also involves brain activity. The balance has to be kept, the muscles coordinated, the eyes must track things, the brain must analyze what it seems and so on.

I notice that different parts of the body have their own exertion limits. When one part is exhausted, another may still have some reserves.
 
Last edited:
poetinsf said:
Spending calories to move muscle or fire neurons.
Click to expand...

Looking at the dictionary definitions, exertion isn't really to do with expending energy or being active.

It means making an effort, or applying a force (which potentially requires no energy if there is no movement even if in biological systems it usually does).

It certainly isn't a stimulus or stressor, as far as I can see.

It involves doing which is a difficult concept because it is tied up with agency and we don't understand agency well. Until we do, I suspect exertion is not a term that can be used in a scientific theory beyond the reference to some subjective sense that someone has made an effort.

I think there is quite a serious problem here because PEM is central to arguments about the causation of MECFS but the exertion bit is highly ambiguous and very open to misinterpretation. Lots of people seem to assume that it implies using energy or being active. If so, it is likely the wrong word.
 
Utsikt said:
Literally everything costs energy, though. So if costing energy = exertion, and exertion causes PEM, we’re at everything causes PEM.
Click to expand...
Similarly you can't stop your neurons from firing, they always fire. One has to be careful with arguments such as "PEM is a consequence of spending calories or neurons firing". One ends up in the vague BPS land very quickly without any meaning.
 
Last edited:
Utsikt said:
Wouldn’t that make literally anything that happens to our body «exertion»?

And isn’t it more or a reaction than an adaptation?
Click to expand...
I’m a cell biologist at heart, everything in our environment can cause the cell to have to exert itself to maintain functioning. For example I think my body is exerting itself trying to maintain an adequate blood pressure in the heat we’ve had where I live right now. Similarly I find it streneous to listen to traffic/building noise, and when in PEM it is downright painful.

The semantics of react or adapt in this context doesn’t make much sense to me, a reaction is often to try to function in a specific context/adapt to input no?
 
Midnattsol said:
I’m a cell biologist at heart, everything in our environment can cause the cell to have to exert itself to maintain functioning. For example I think my body is exerting itself trying to maintain an adequate blood pressure in the heat we’ve had where I live right now. Similarly I find it streneous to listen to traffic/building noise, and when in PEM it is downright painful.

The semantics of react or adapt in this context doesn’t make much sense to me, a reaction is often to try to function in a specific context/adapt to input no?
Click to expand...
To me, adaptation is an abstract concept that can only be used about systems. It also usually implies agency.

The cell isn’t «trying to function», it’s individual atoms and molecules are just reacting according to the laws of physics, etc. (although you probably have to get down to the quantum mechanics at some point).

Essentially, it’s the same issue as JE described above with regards to exertion.
 
Utsikt said:
The cell isn’t «trying to function», it’s individual atoms and molecules are just reacting according to the laws of physics, etc. (although you probably have to get down to the quantum mechanics at some point).
Click to expand...
To me we humans are also just reacting to our environment, be it physics or more abstract social stuff (I don’t believe much if any in free will, but in day-to-day that doesn’t really matter). I do believe «anything» can cause PEM, partly as that is my own experience and partly as that is how I interpret it when I hear someone say exertion and the inclusion of different kinds of exertion like physical, cognitive and emotional in others’ stories (so yes we are going in circles on the meaning of the words).

I struggle to understand why it is problematic to say everything can potentially cause PEM. To me it sounds like arguments I hear when someone has food allergies and are being told it’s impossible that there are so many foods they cannot eat (and how can it possibly be made worse by exertion*, seasons** or suddenly appear in adulthood*** etc etc)

*exercise induced food allergies (most known with wheat)
**food allergies made worse by say pollen allergy
***meat allergy from tick bites

Edit to add: Migraines are another thing that can be caused by «anything». Physical activity was one of my triggers. Together with sensory inputs. The noise sensitivity I have with PEM feels similar to the one I had when I had a migraine attack.
 
Last edited:
Jonathan Edwards said:
Looking at the dictionary definitions, exertion isn't really to do with expending energy or being active.

It means making an effort, or applying a force (which potentially requires no energy if there is no movement even if in biological systems it usually does).

It certainly isn't a stimulus or stressor, as far as I can see.

It involves doing which is a difficult concept because it is tied up with agency and we don't understand agency well. Until we do, I suspect exertion is not a term that can be used in a scientific theory beyond the reference to some subjective sense that someone has made an effort.

I think there is quite a serious problem here because PEM is central to arguments about the causation of MECFS but the exertion bit is highly ambiguous and very open to misinterpretation. Lots of people seem to assume that it implies using energy or being active. If so, it is likely the wrong word.
Click to expand...
It’s hard because eg I’m feeling awful today from a calendar last week that means this isn’t surprising

So today just getting my medication involves much more than on a day of at a time where I’m less in PEM

I’m curious to know (would an app tell us) whether and what terms we use for example if I managed to brush my teeth the exact same way (same amount of sitting up, arm hold or movement) on a day like today vs a day where I feel less awful then is that a different thing.

I also don’t know whether for example with the ‘you aren’t unfit but have me/cfs’ point that means that if when more well I could do a pretty swift 800m walk going to a meeting vs lolloping it slowly did it make a difference on either the PEM I had later or the overall deterioration over time of my me/cfs. Or was it just the having to walk the 800m at all that did it. Ie are fit people at more risk of more pen/deterioration because they could ‘do more’ without realising it was ‘exertion’ at the time

You’d think I’d have the answers to these questions but of course it takes a lot of thinking because across different jobs and different periods these things came in packages. So for example I’d not just walked that day but had 25phone calls and questions in person at the same time whilst also trying to do other work. Or maybe some days I didn’t and had a calm organised workload without interruptions but had that walk (but how much did earlier days carry over). And whilst I got continual worsening calf and shin pain and disappearing lower legs as eg car parks moved further from office the ‘central’ impact of said exertion would somewhat I assume all overlap with the sensory and cognitive and orthostatic to just be me not being able to wake up or move

I think these app tech things could be really helpful if they work closely to work out how to differentiate these things and concepts. If you find it easy to reel off a sheet of complex maths for example does the exertion end up the same as someone who found it excruciatingly hard to do said maths

All of these things now of course lurk around the things normal people consider basic but are some of the most taxing tasks like tooth brushing or showering
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom