Tired minds, normal scores: rethinking cognitive fatigue in multiple sclerosis, 2025, Davide Spinetti et al

[Mij]

Cognitive fatigue is among the most pervasive and disabling symptoms experienced by individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), yet it remains underrecognized and undertreated in both research and clinical settings. Despite its prevalence, cognitive fatigue is often confused with general fatigue or overlooked in standard neuropsychological assessments that rely on brief, decontextualized performance measures. This perspective argues for a paradigmatic shift in how cognitive fatigue is conceptualized and managed.

This perspective define it as a core, dynamic dysfunction affecting the cognitive system’s capacity to sustain effort over time, distinct from both general and subjective fatigue. A growing body of evidence, highlighted in this article, shows a frequent dissociation between perceived fatigue and objective fatigability, underscoring a fundamental flaw in current assessment tools. The authors call for the integration of prolonged, dynamic, and ecologically valid measures, such as extended neuropsychological tasks and digital phenotyping, into clinical protocols.

We propose repositioning cognitive fatigue as a distinct clinical target, requiring its own specific strategies for identification, monitoring, and intervention. Reframing cognitive fatigue in this way offers a critical step toward more accurate diagnostics and truly individualized care, bridging the gap between clinical findings and the patient’s lived experience

LINK

 

[Mij]

Introduction​

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is well known for its motor symptoms, sensory disturbances, and visual impairments, but perhaps less visible, though no less disabling, are the cognitive consequences of the disease (1, 2). Among these, cognitive fatigue stands out as both extremely common and poorly understood. Studies suggest that between 65 and 90% of individuals with MS report experiencing some form of fatigue, and a significant portion of them identify cognitive fatigue as the most debilitating aspect (3–5). Despite its prevalence and profound impact on quality of life, cognitive fatigue remains underrepresented in diagnostic frameworks and therapeutic approaches. A core challenge in addressing this symptom is its elusive nature and a lack of consistent terminology. For the purpose of this Perspective, we define “Fatigue” as a broad, overarching term for a state of weariness that can be physical, mental, or a combination of both (6) (see glossary). Within this, we distinguish between:

• Subjective cognitive fatigue: the patient’s self-reported, internal sensation of mental exhaustion or lack of energy for an ongoing cognitive task (

• Objective cognitive fatigability: a measurable decline in cognitive performance (e.g., speed, accuracy) over the duration of a sustained or repeated task

The distinction between the subjective feeling and the objective, measurable decline is crucial, as a growing body of evidence shows these two dimensions are often dissociated, with weak or no correlation between them (10, 11). This paradox highlights a fundamental failing of current assessment paradigms, which are primarily based on brief, decontextualized performance measures.

Standard neuropsychological tests, while effective at identifying stable deficits, often fail to capture the dynamic and context-sensitive nature of cognitive fatigability, and neuropsychological tests alone may fail to provide clinical predictability (42). As a result, a patient may perform “within normal limits” on a standard cognitive battery yet struggle to maintain attention at work or follow a conversation for a prolonged period (12).

This mismatch between clinical findings and lived experience underscores the urgent need for a new conceptual and methodological approach. This article argues for a paradigmatic shift in how cognitive fatigue in MS is conceptualized and managed. Rather than treating it as a vague, secondary complaint, the Authors propose to reposition it as a core, dynamic dysfunction that requires specific assessment tools, dedicated interventions, and centrality in clinical decision-making.

This perspective aims to illuminate why current models fail, what a more ecologically valid approach would look like, and how shifting our clinical priorities might transform care for people with MS.

 

[Hutan]

From the excerpts posted, this looks like a useful contribution to the field of cognitive fatigue. Rather than dismissing the feeling of fatigue as some moral failing in the person reporting it when tests fail to provide objective evidence of a problem, these authors seem to be saying 'the problem is in our tests. Let's make better ones.'

Among these, cognitive fatigue stands out as both extremely common and poorly understood. Studies suggest that between 65 and 90% of individuals with MS report experiencing some form of fatigue, and a significant portion of them identify cognitive fatigue as the most debilitating aspect (3–5).

It's also good to see the recognition of cognitive fatigue as a life-limiting problem worthy of study and treatments.

This paper might be useful in advocacy efforts e.g. if a patient reports cognitive constraints in order to qualify for assistance/benefits, but the tests don't support the claim.

It also reminds me of how much in common people with MS have with people with ME/CFS. My experience so far has been that MS doctors don't want to have anything to do with ME/CFS. But, if there was willingness, I think MS clinical services would have useful things to offer people with ME/CFS.