Towards an institute for patient-led research - Trish Greenhalgh, BMJ blog November 12, 2019

Discussion in 'Research methodology news and research' started by Sly Saint, Nov 13, 2019.

  1. Caroline Struthers

    Caroline Struthers Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    Oxford UK
    OK. Well I posted a comment in agreement the one that questioned whether lack of equipoise was only a problem with patients, and it didn't get through the approval stage (presumably because I mentioned PACE), so I posted another one saying I was keen to join the discussion, but having trouble! I expect that will not be posted either!
     
    Peter Trewhitt, rvallee and Andy like this.
  2. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,662
    Location:
    Canada
    I'll give it another day and re-submit tomorrow. Still pending. Weird how one of the comments is timestamped as 3 days ago yet only appeared today.
     
  3. Caroline Struthers

    Caroline Struthers Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    Oxford UK
    Sure enough - it's not been posted. So much for free speech eh?!
     
  4. Hoopoe

    Hoopoe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,426
    "patient involvement" that does not include dissenting voices is just a way to let researchers deflect criticism of insufficient patient involvement while continuing to do exactly what patients don't want.
     
    Joh, ScottTriGuy, Sean and 12 others like this.
  5. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,002
    Location:
    Belgium
    Well said.
     
    Caroline Struthers and rvallee like this.
  6. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,924
    Location:
    UK
  7. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,662
    Location:
    Canada
    Re-submitted 3 days ago. Both still left at "pending". Oh, well.
     
    Esther12 likes this.

Share This Page