Tragus Nerve Stimulation Attenuates Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome in Post COVID-19 Infection, 2025, Zhuo Wang et al

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by Mij, Mar 1, 2025.

  1. Mij

    Mij Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    10,073
    ABSTRACT
    Background
    Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is characterized by symptoms of orthostatic intolerance and is frequently observed in post-COVID conditions.

    Objectives
    We conducted controlled, prospective, and randomized clinical trials to explore the potential therapeutic benefits of low-level tragus stimulation (LL-TS) in patients with POTS following COVID-19 infection.

    Methods
    This study enrolled 57 participants with confirmed post-acute COVID-19 who had been diagnosed with POTS. The ear clip was attached to the right tragus of the patients for stimulation (20 Hz with a 1-ms duration) or sham stimulation. They were divided into two groups: the sham LL-TS group (sham stimulation, n = 26) and the LL-TS group (stimulation for 1 month, n = 31). LL-TS was performed 1 h twice daily for 1 month. Postural tachycardia was evaluated at baseline, 1-month visit, and 1-year visit. Heart rate variability (HRV) and plasma neuropeptide Y (NPY) were evaluated at respective time points.

    Results
    The mean age of participants was 31.9 ± 7.2 years (61.4% female). LL-TS significantly attenuated the increase in heart rate from supine to a 10-min stand, as well as the average and maximum heart rates after 1 month of treatment. LL-TS also significantly reduced NPY levels. In addition, LL-TS significantly increased the high frequency (HF), but decreased the low frequency (LF) and LF/HF ratio during the postural test (all p < 0.01). These effects persisted during the 1-year follow-up.

    Conclusion
    LL-TS may be a promising therapeutic approach for attenuating autonomic imbalance in patients with POTS following COVID-19 infection.
    LINK
     
    mango, Hutan and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  2. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,170
    Location:
    Norway
    Grey = treatment group
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Peter Trewhitt likes this.
  3. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,170
    Location:
    Norway
    They did not measure symptoms related to POT, which is a shame.

    It’s surprising that the changes lasted for so long.
     
    Hutan and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  4. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,378
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    A study from Wuhan, China.


    Last time we looked, studies of tragus stimulation were flawed and unreliable. The tragus is just the pointy bit of cartilage in front of the ear canal - so, up from the ear lobe, but on the face side of the ear, rather than on the side of the ear that flaps around in the wind. Last time we looked, it was not at all clear that a clip on the tragus would do anything to the vagus nerve. Also, last time we looked, the devices providing stimulation were expensive and being aggressively marketed.


    That's a bit weird. It's not clear what the patients actually consented to.

    Selection criteria:
    So, 57 patients, all with POTS. Two groups, one given real tragus stimulation and the other given sham tragus stimulation.
    Outcomes are the neuropeptide Y, heart rate variability and heart rate (at baseline after 25 minutes supine , and after 10 minutes standing). It is a shame that there is no global measure of quality of life. I'm surprised there were not more things measured in the blood sample, perhaps they were, but only the NPY is reported?

    Measurements at baseline, the end of 1 month of treatment and at 1 year followup.
     
    Mij, Trish, Wyva and 1 other person like this.
  5. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,378
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    2.4 The Effects of LL-TS on HR Changes During the 24 h-Holter
    There's an error in the text - there were no differences in the minimum heart rate recorded in the 24-hour holter measurements, neither at different measurement times or between groups. The bolded 'minimum's should be 'average'.



     
    Mij, Trish, Wyva and 1 other person like this.
  6. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,378
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    The differences look robust, the study seems to be mostly ok, apart from the glitch in wording I noted above. I didn't see any information about dropouts though, which may perhaps be driving the changes. The figure captions suggests that there were no dropouts, which would be very unusual. Also, it doesn't look as if the assessors were blinded.

    There are no reported conflicts of interest. If one month use of the tragus stimulator permanently improved the POTS symptoms and that improvement continued for the next year until participants had almost normal responses to standing, it really would be a remarkable finding. I remain rather skeptical though.
     
    Mij, Trish, Wyva and 2 others like this.
  7. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,378
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Here's our vagal nerve stimulation discussion thread, which includes a fair bit on tragus clips.

    Vagus Nerve Stimulation

    I haven't read over the thread in detail lately, but my impression is that members have mostly not reported it being the miracle cure that this study suggests it is. When they have reported initial improvements, it does not appear that the improvements have been sustained.
     
  8. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,170
    Location:
    Norway
    It might be that this study stumbled upon a sweet spot of 20 Hz with a 1-ms duration? I have not read the VNS thread yet.
     
    Peter Trewhitt and Hutan like this.
  9. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,378
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Does it make sense that the frequency that works (assuming it works, which I think is rather unlikely) would be exactly the same for everyone, regardless of their size, and other things?
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2025
    Peter Trewhitt likes this.
  10. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,170
    Location:
    Norway
    I can only speculate, but I can imagine that the right frequency could be tied to the physical properties of the nervous system? I’m not sure if those are different in different people.
     
    Peter Trewhitt likes this.
  11. rapidboson

    rapidboson Established Member

    Messages:
    23
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2025
    Peter Trewhitt likes this.
  12. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,170
    Location:
    Norway
    Peter Trewhitt and rapidboson like this.
  13. Yann04

    Yann04 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,702
    Location:
    Romandie (Switzerland)
    I’m not sure if the blinding was necessarily well done.

    Because when my VNS is on I can feel a slight electrical tingling on my ear. I’m willing to bet since the “sham” was sending no current the controls didn’t feel that.

    I really feel like they should be comparing frequencies instead of doing an impossible blinding.
     
    Trish and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  14. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,170
    Location:
    Norway
    According to other patients, the feeling depends on the Amp - you don’t feel it if it’s low enough. I can’t find the Amp figures in this study, though.
     
    Peter Trewhitt and Yann04 like this.
  15. Yann04

    Yann04 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,702
    Location:
    Romandie (Switzerland)
    I honestly know nothing about electronics so Amp Frequency Volt make no sense to me.

    I was sick with my COVID infection that eventually got me here when we were covering that in school haha. (So I’ll trust your judgement).
     
    Peter Trewhitt likes this.
  16. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,170
    Location:
    Norway
    @Yann04 Here’s a brief summary in case anyone are interested.

    Amp and Volt are two different measures of how much electricity that’s flowing through the cable. If you multiply them with eachother, you get Watts.

    Higher Amp is like a wider water pipe, but the same water pressure. Higher Volt is like more water pressure, but the same size pipe. Higher Watts just means more water through the pipe in total, irrespective of how it was achieved.

    Ohm is resistance, i.e. how ‘easy’ or ‘hard’ it is for the electricity to flow through the cable.

    Hz (frequency) says how often the current switches from positive to negative. 60 hz = 60 switches in one second. This is only relevant for AC (alternate current). DC (direct current) doesn’t switch.
     
    Sean and Peter Trewhitt like this.

Share This Page