UK Government ME/CFS Delivery Plan (includes Attitudes and Education Working Group and Living with ME Working Group) and consultation

I personally think it more likely that the delay has arisen within the process itself largely because it is all hot air. People put in charge may have left because they had other things to do or others could not agree on anything or thought they needed to abide by some further politically correct rules.

These things are run by people who need to be "busy" but have no idea why.
 
Daisymay said:
Could the delay be due to more interference from the Royal Colleges again, on behalf of the BPS brigade?
Click to expand...
I'll be optimistic and hope it's that because of all the positive lobbying from charities like AfME, T4ME and FME they've finally realised they actually do have to add some real, substantive actions into the plan and then actually deliver them. The actions in the interim plan were feeble.
 
ME Research UK:
Apart from being published 'soon' what do we know about contents of the Delivery Plan? Further details of what the Delivery Plan may contain have been made public by Ashley Dalton MP Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) in answer to queries by Sarah Gibson MP - https://tinyurl.com/4474hxzn

In summary - the Department has acknowledged

1. ME/CFS research is an under-funded area. However, they state that this situation is directly related to the number and quality of applications received by MRC and NIHR.

This is the same line taken by the government for decades and despite ME/CFS being a priority area for MRC.

2. No 'ring-fenced' funds for ME/CFS research as all applications will be in open competition with all other funding applications for all other diseases.

3. "... we are actively exploring next steps for research in ME/CFS, and we will outline in the delivery plan further research actions and the additional support we will offer to the research community to increase the volume and quality of applications."

4. "a new funding opportunity for a development award focussed on evaluating repurposed pharmaceutical inventions for post-acute infection syndromes and associated conditions, including ME/CFS"

NB - not just ME/CFS but for post-acute syndromes and associated conditions.

5. Planning "an NIHR and MRC hosted showcase event for post-acute infection conditions, including ME/CFS and long COVID"

NB - not just ME/CFS but for post-acute syndromes and associated conditions.
 
Cinders66 said:
Do they do that?
It does seem like it’s a dirty little secret they are keen to bury. If it was something good it would be something to promote as "we are finally the ones who're going to do right by this community & affecting 100s of 1000s and their families”
Click to expand...
well it isn’t legislative so no parliamentary involvement and it is a niche topic- unlike Sajid Javid who made clear his personal commitment none of the current ministerial team at Health is treating it with anything approaching that.

I think it is likely to be either a low key announcement or probably being kept on hold to provide material to use when DecodeME is published so that the Health department can be perceived as taking action.
 
NelliePledge said:
well it isn’t legislative so no parliamentary involvement and it is a niche topic- unlike Sajid Javid who made clear his personal commitment none of the current ministerial team at Health is treating it with anything approaching that.

I think it is likely to be either a low key announcement or probably being kept on hold to provide material to use when DecodeME is published so that the Health department can be perceived as taking action.
Click to expand...
Yes I think it is being tied to DecodeME and was used as a time filler until DecodeME publication, probably not expecting the year delay in that. Even with Sajid Javid, both meruk and Invest in ME were saying his wording at the start about funds for research being available from existing budgets meant intent to not designate more, + the latching onto lighter topics such as "language" etc that cost little to change. Speding decisions on research when there is just cause, as i believe we have, are usually influenced by public and media pressure, we have exerted little.
 
hotblack said:
Yes, I think it’s worth remembering that many of the lines and challenges are seen with other conditions too. I’ve been watching similar messages about funding and other areas in response to the Parky Charter, which has people with media experience and profiles behind it and a sizeable petition.
Click to expand...
What do you mean similar messages? I too have been watching that campaign, the government response is that Parkinson’s has already had £70+ million tax payer funding over a period of 5 years from 2019 (giving it a £100/patient / year government investment vs ME about £4). Those efforts of both clear & well organised campaigns & the state funding for Parkinson’s put those for m.e to shame..
 
Cinders66 said:
What do you mean similar messages? I too have been watching that campaign, the government response is that Parkinson’s has already had £70+ million tax payer funding over a period of 5 years from 2019 (giving it a £100/patient / year government investment vs ME about £4). Those efforts of both clear & well organised campaigns & the state funding for Parkinson’s put those for m.e to shame..
Click to expand...
I mean similar messages from the government. Saying they will not increase specific funding for Parkinson’s, referring back to the NICE guidelines, saying it is up to ICBs, talking about how research is funded through the NIHR and funding applications are welcome.
 
Google is sayimg Summer recess 24th July. Dr Charles Shepherd is Intimating the publishing date is imminent and I guess it’s likely the top level collaborator orgs know. I just want it to be over so that this pause that has been on us since 2018? When MEA started working with NICE where everything has been behind the scenes and Hush hush and elites only and excusing the absence of any activism, as well as preventing Any, is over.

2018-21 the NICE guidelines
2020-2022 the James Lind Priority setting partnership
2022- 2025 DHSC delivery plan
The APPG comms closed, the forward m.e minutes closed down. The CMRC suspended. #Millionsmissing acrivism Fizzling out.

The great pause, is over. 7 years of behind the scenes committees & minimal patient engagement - other action. A dream for some . Following dangled carrots. Not a lot of tangible change/ progress unless the DHSC delivery plan pulls something from its sleeve or DecodeME provides the ground breaking. For ME patients like me, It’s felt like the 7 years of famine in the Old Testament. Let’s see what is done now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom