What needs to change to ensure better care for people with ME/CFS with feeding difficulties?

Discussion in 'General clinical care' started by MrMagoo, Oct 18, 2024.

  1. Ash

    Ash Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,646
    Location:
    UK
    I guess I agree with all of this except the ‘common sense’ part. Common sense doesn’t have to be good. There is a sense about us that they share and it’s fatal to our hopes of treatment.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2024
    Hutan, bobbler, Kitty and 1 other person like this.
  2. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    15,175
    Location:
    London, UK
    Yes, except it looks as if we now have a situation with too many guidelines from which people can pick and choose.

    I don't buy the argument that there are no resources for dealing with people with severe ME/CFS. In Exeter a physician with knowledge of ME/CFS was there. The facilities and technology for feeding support existed. A bed was found. And so on. It looks very much as if quasi-guidelines were used to deny care.
     
    SNT Gatchaman, obeat, Hutan and 5 others like this.
  3. Kitty

    Kitty Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,801
    Location:
    UK
    No, absolutely not. But whether the problem is to do with the guidelines themselves or how they're applied, it has to be approached transparently.

    Denying nutrition when there are ways to supply it isn't an unfortunate omission, or an unexpected failure, or outside of what doctors can reasonably control. It's a considered clinical decision with a potentially fatal outcome. It's not hard for anyone to see why the evidence for it shouldn't be sought in the long grass on the outskirts of neighbouring guidelines.
     
    obeat and bobbler like this.

Share This Page