Search results

At least if they become redundant they will be fulfilling the full potential of their brains.

I have google translated this back into English: They dont work but they are the beast we have got and they are well documented. Yes we lack science.

So Up to Date Collates the info and uses a 50% figure? Does that tell you the source of any potential meme that leads to the eventual figures for the diagnostic label MUS? If we look back over the life of the term MUS is it on an upward curve or a downward one or has it remained steady? When I...

Shes not fit to write a Cochrane review then if she cant handle the scientific critique. She admits to not being able to handle the critique. She has been given over two years to address the issues raised against her by Cochrane via Bobs dissection of her review and has failed miserably...

Latest news: NICE have just approved Lucazade, grapes and a nice bunch of flowers as a treatment for every illness in the ICD.

Yes how bizarre that as a psychiatrist he cant handle some people disagreeing with him and had to go off and work in cancer care according to himself.

@Paul Watton I have noticed you just liked my last post. How dare you as I have never even met you!!

Isn't Parker also an osteopath?

And yet they have an opinion on his work???!! How shocking. Does one have to meet the Priminster to have an opinion on her impact on people? How about Trump? Bush? Blair? Michael Jackson? As the long awaited "hit piece", if that's what its supposed to be, this is just pathetic. It just rolls...

The point of the term MUS in the UK is to save billions not to spend it so in all likely hood the 50% figure came from lies and was deliberately presented to stupid policy makers.

How long before Clare Gerada is tweeting out some spin on this claiming British justice has lost its way.

I'm finding it hard to refrain from using the word arseholes.

Why do you have to highlight all my failings in so many details and keep responding when I try to cover them up, its just so annoying.

Referring to the NICE review future outcome Apart from the parallel of the parallel universe we have all experienced for decades wherby the BPS crowd have pumped out years of unchallenged nonsense, with their mates as peer reviewers and practically every influential governmental department and...

Yes that was partly my thinking when I read that post too. Its not the presenters that necessarily get to have the final say.

I agree with most of that Diane but it wasn't me who termed the phrase "messed up" here and equated it to all of us in the sense that we must all be a bit messed up because of our experiences. It also wasn't me who claimed on behalf of all of us that we are all suffering shell shock or PTSD...

Diane O'Leary said: A psychology being impacted does not automatically equate to an individual being psychologically harmed. Learning by experiencing impacts on our psychological processes actions and experiences. Its a fairly loose use of terms to impose this notion of being...

That's not the definition of shell shock or PTSD. We should all know how important it is to define our terms correctly. Neither am I "messed up". The messed up ones are on the opposing side and I refuse to refer to my experiencing of them as utterly deluded, as me being messed up. I have...

Yes I was referring to the process making a final decision next year on the guidelines.

I am not suffering from shell shock.