Search results

Well you have been going on about being promiscuous in theatres or something...... I think ..... :confused:

Yes, I think this journal is setting themselves up for a potential lawsuit, when you look at recent developments in Academic institutes, Parliament, The CDC, NICE, medical journals, scientists and statisticians with large numbers of MPs and such like waking up over the the abuse of health policy...

What is the current state of play over this so called withdrawn review that doesn't appear to be withdrawn. Last we heard Cochrane were giving Larun yet another chance to rewrite the review or were they? No one really knows. Almost two months later and we still have no progress. No statement...

We must blame patients for antibiotic use so that the meat industry can continue on with their mass production on a scale never seen before and the veil isn't lifted on how alleged antibiotic resistance in people has made its way into the human population.

It's also chilling that they seem to know they are protected and can blatantly get away with junk science and propaganda simply because it suits a political narrative. Its really shines a light on the lack of scrutiny on "evidence based medicine" and how appalling journalism is and that its...

I really wonder how alleged spurious death threats justifies people can be declared to be ill enough to enter a trial and simultaneously declared recovered at the same time logical.

We aernt? What are we referring to then regarding Valerie seeing a tape of alleged criminal threats?

Did the person on that video identify themselves or show their face or was it just a voice making the alleged criminal threats? Was the video on a tape sent in the post or was it done online? By any chance was it an artist impression of a what a threat could have looked like if it did happen...

Keiths own words which I was referring to in my previous post relating to the conduct of Holgate........... https://forums.phoenixrising.me/index.php?threads/petition-opposing-mega.47466/page-44#post-786584 my dealings with the CMRC I just want to recount to you all what joining CMRC meant...

Wow, I never read that before. It is just shocking. What was the outcome of the complaints to his university? As for Holgate, it just about says it all!

What's so astonishing is that this journalist is setting out to trash another journalist. Doing so on the basis that the person doing the initial investigations (David Tuller) into public health policy, governmental departments, the withholding of scientific data etc whilst having sourced...

We told you you didn't have cancer ten years ago why do you still not believe us?

Ye why give someone 100 grand a year to sit there all day saying "next", when some one who cant stand working in a factory any longer can "retrain" to say next for the doctor on a fraction of the pay.

Maybe the other half are related to people going back to complain about the doctor for getting their diagnosis wrong when they were in the first 50%.

I was actually very calm when I posted that @Trish, just being completely pragmatic. Its like we are standing infront of the keystone kops pointing at people dressed in blue and white striped T shirts with a bag on their shoulders marked "swag" slipping on strawberry jelly and they just keep...

How many times do we have to go through this crap with AfME before they just disband themselves and do us all a favour once and for all? How many times do we have to hear them defending some big pile of crap they have chucked us all in with a pathetic defence. Then we have to baby step them and...

So he was talking out of his mouth when he said it?

Does this justify the government funding utter prejudicial unscientific bullshit, even if it was true that people aern't compromised by refusing such "treatments" and parents put at risk of family interventions, child protection orders, school attendance officers and worse for "refusing...

I think you are somewhat misguided, Simon Wessely retired from ME years ago.

According to the BPS crowd PACE had to be done because we didn't have a definitive answer previously in a large enough trial.