Search results

This is IinME response to Groves BMJ review of the 2011 IinME conference. http://www.investinme.org/Article-504%20BMJ.htm

IinME record all their conferences I think this was from 2011. I'm also pretty certain Groves said in response to some of the patients that, "PACE investigators never said they were studying "CFS/ME". She got a response from the audience of, "why did they get £5 million to do so then". She...

Basically this all means that publishers are all one entity and COPE are their Public Relations department.

I'm pretty sure when she tried to tweet out her deluded interpretation of events she got retweeted with the truth, not a single person backed up her presentation of events. I doubt that has stopped her telling it her way in the subsequent years to many people she comes into contact with who...

I'm not sure the audio was good enough to pick up the audience remarks as they where not all on the mic but Groves remarks definitely should be. Even the way she spoke to Kogelnik a researcher who was on the stage, when she earlier addressed him from the audience was like a schoolmaster...

I think it was to do with a number of things but solely related to her being a patronizing, prejudiced, ill informed, offensive, deluded cow.

I'm currently less inclined to respond to this survey and more inclined to request Charles Shepherds participation back on the online forums regarding the numerous developments there have been around the Tuller blogs, the BMJ and COPE issue and the ongoing damage Crawley is doing with her...

The video edited out the audience comments that day. I was there and Groves was a patronizing cow, who made remarks to sick people like "why does it matter to you", regarding the findings from the trial, simply because people had pointed out the obvious flaws in the Q and A session, which...

Wow, just how generic can they make this with one Guru doctor for all pain and all fatigue. All pain and all fatigue is the same cause and only one doctor Crawley needs to be consulted.

Why the hell does COPE need to ask the BMJ to provide info that is freely available. Having said that its fascinating that the BMJ will keep going on record supplying utter delusion in their responses when the information is freely accessible and contradicts their support of the publication...

At school I had an PE teacher who took a bunch of people who could run the 100 metres in 15 seconds or under. He wanted to improve our times so he decided he would set the target of improvement to 14 seconds or under and train us physically and encourage us mentally for six weeks then review...

This basically means when people want to debate us the following talk will describe the tactics that we use to avoid content debates at all cost and churn out nonsense about it being unhelpful to see things as either psychological or physiological and how to go around doing presentations like...

This is why I think its pointless engaging in a debate as to whether Crawleys video is damaging the TEDx Brand. Exactly who verifies whether someone is a medical pioneer or not inside TED headquarters before that person gives such a speech. No one I bet. I would wager TED is a bunch of 20...

Whats so weird is if he is an acclaimed psychiatrist does he think this is a way to address a patient population. Its basic egotistical taunting. Some psychiatrist! Where are the journalists talking about his cyberstalking?

How about we all unlike loads of your posts!!!!

I wouldn't place too much credence into the claim that Crawley has encountered any real cyber stalking or "death threats" even from a tiny minority. Shes just a born fucking liar.

Yes if this is her level of trying her best as an experienced professor her PHD thesis as a student must be fascinating.

The system is a self protecting, "if you tell on me ill tell on you". Basically as peer review is broken, keeping your job relies on pumping out papers to bring in money for your institution and conflict of interest run ripe, the whole thing is a bloody farce.

This is the whole point. When an ignoramus rises to the top there is supposed to be layers and layers of self correction to stop them continuing, infact it should happen as they attempt to get there in the process as it happens. But as in so many things in our societies this is proof that all of...

So fuck the patients and just let her get on with it "cos she trying"? I wonder what definition of the placebo effect she is using here. Its so easy for quacks to come out with the old, "as long as it helps the patient recover who cares if its a placebo". In my opinion that's the cowards way...