Search results

That's pretty much my point though, all flu colds etc are are continuously new strains all the time. But my question is where is the real evidence that this is more deadly than all the other strains we have seen. Just saying it kills 2 out of 100 people when we are admitting we have no idea...

Is anyone on this forum willing to take the test being completely non symptomatic knowing that the government could have the power to quarantine them in such a way as we have seen done in China? As we all know now the claim is that you can pass it on if you are carrying the virus but you don't...

I haven't actually said they belong to different families of viruses in fact I was saying that they all come under the same blanket according to the mainstream scientists flu is a generic term. Also the claim that there is an objective test for this coronavirus we all seem to be accepting at...

@Trish yes that's kind of my point it seems that the flu and coronavirus hardly appear different to each other so how can you have credible figures over coronavirus being a "deadly killer" any more than the flu as when we have the flu virus we are never actually put through an objective test to...

That's the claim but its seems questionable that if there has been an outbreak in China that it hasn't already spread around the world. Yes I understand that the claim is that it is being quarantined in China to stop it spreading but the actions being taken in China are not incompatible with...

How many people contract the regular flu every year in China and what are the statistics on the flu going on to result in death in China. When people get the regular Flu in China have they ever before this new coronavirus outbreak tested people to see if that flu contained cases of coronavirus...

I couldn't believe that random breath tests where permitted in Australia when I saw it on a TV show the other day.

The purpose of this is to dispose of cash altogether then every single transaction anyone makes can be seen, scrutinised and judged in real time. Then that data will also be shared with insurance companies, health care suppliers and change agents etc. It will also give them algorithms of...

I really think this is why the BPS crowd don't care about how people are pointing out their nonsense over ME. For all they care ME can be declared proven organic tomorrow, they just wont use the label anymore and will just tell everyone they have MUS. They went from ME to "CFS" and now onto...

It's also the absolute irony that often PWME are at risk of being stolen away from their families and prohibited from seeing them at all that makes this statement so awfully misguided.

Presumably only if all of your family are also ill and you are all stuck in the same bedroom on benefits?

....however we have invented hundreds of labels that ensure this happens anyway.

Just imagine! Walk into a doctors room with ME and who should be sitting in the chair but Wessely. Oh what a treat!!

Science is pronouncements by the most powerful.

Pathetic.

Gwynth needs to gets published in the BMJ then it will all be ok.

How many times @Action for M.E. Its the same line over and over again. "We are sorry we got xyz wrong we will ammend xyz".... "we have taken your comments on board". Yet again we hear it will take time to make the necessary amendments on errors of judgement that should NEVER have happened in...

Au contraire.......JOHN SMITH!!!! :emoji_angry:

Yes true but whats the starting point. When its don't know or cant be bothered finding out its default to psychiatric. Yet how can there ever be any conclusive evidence of "psychiatric" to commence the legacy? How many times do they have to make this mistake when evidence has eventually proven...

Yes true but also such warped logic. Look at autism, epilepsy and even being gay how they have previously been listed. Dumping categories. Surely the starting position should be non psychiatric or dont know not the other way around.